Clinical efficacy of periosteal pedicle graft with subepithelial connective tissue graft in gingival recession coverage

Introduction: Correction of gingival recession (GR) involves eliminating the cause of recession and it often requires surgical correction. Subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) technique by Langer and Langer provides excellent esthetics and is considered most predictable in obtaining marginal...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Priyanka Prakash (Author), Saroj K Rath (Author), Manish Mukherjee (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2019-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_e14c46a0c6c3498e9e9aa8d27c2d05b5
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Priyanka Prakash  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Saroj K Rath  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Manish Mukherjee  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Clinical efficacy of periosteal pedicle graft with subepithelial connective tissue graft in gingival recession coverage 
260 |b Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications,   |c 2019-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 0972-124X 
500 |a 10.4103/jisp.jisp_676_18 
520 |a Introduction: Correction of gingival recession (GR) involves eliminating the cause of recession and it often requires surgical correction. Subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) technique by Langer and Langer provides excellent esthetics and is considered most predictable in obtaining marginal tissue recession coverage. However, the requirement of a second surgical procedure for harvesting CTG remote from planned site of recession coverage increases the chances of postoperative infection. There is also a limitation in the amount of graft that can be harvested and an increased operative time contributing to patient discomfort. Materials and Methods: Overcoming these difficulties has become possible with the introduction of "periosteal pedicle graft" (PPG). The study is a split-mouth design where patients with bilateral, isolated GR defects were treated using two different surgical techniques, i.e., PPG versus the SCTG in obtaining GR coverage. The objective was to analyze the comparative amount of root coverage and the gain in width of attached gingiva achieved by both the techniques. Results: All the clinical parameters evaluated were comparable between SCTG and PPG when recorded at 6 and 9 months posttreatment. Conclusion: Both techniques produced satisfactory and predictable results. PPG eliminated the need for the 2nd operative site, lesser intraoperative time, and hence, patient comfort was enhanced. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Gingival recession coverage 
690 |a periosteal pedicle graft 
690 |a subepithelial connective tissue graft 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology, Vol 23, Iss 5, Pp 442-447 (2019) 
787 0 |n http://www.jisponline.com/article.asp?issn=0972-124X;year=2019;volume=23;issue=5;spage=442;epage=447;aulast=Prakash 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/0972-124X 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/e14c46a0c6c3498e9e9aa8d27c2d05b5  |z Connect to this object online.