Foundations of Community Engagement: A Series for Effective Community-Engaged Research

Introduction Medical students lack systematic exposure to community engagement. Community-engaged research (CEnR) is an effective approach to improve community health, and community-engaged physicians are better attuned to the community context of their patients' health and well-being. The Medi...

Popoln opis

Shranjeno v:
Bibliografske podrobnosti
Main Authors: Bryan Johnston (Author), Leslie Ruffalo (Author), David Nelson (Author), Sarah O'Connor (Author), Staci Young (Author)
Format: Knjiga
Izdano: Association of American Medical Colleges, 2023-10-01T00:00:00Z.
Teme:
Online dostop:Connect to this object online.
Oznake: Označite
Brez oznak, prvi označite!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_e19ddbd0af8540778ecd39ae4f783b51
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Bryan Johnston  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Leslie Ruffalo  |e author 
700 1 0 |a David Nelson  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Sarah O'Connor  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Staci Young  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Foundations of Community Engagement: A Series for Effective Community-Engaged Research 
260 |b Association of American Medical Colleges,   |c 2023-10-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11350 
500 |a 2374-8265 
520 |a Introduction Medical students lack systematic exposure to community engagement. Community-engaged research (CEnR) is an effective approach to improve community health, and community-engaged physicians are better attuned to the community context of their patients' health and well-being. The Medical College of Wisconsin (MCW) Office of Community Engagement began offering the educational series Foundations of Community Engagement in 2021 to meet this need. Methods We developed and implemented a four-session series for medical students at MCW and the University of Nebraska Medical Center. A 1-hour session on the foundations of CEnR was held for all learners. Three 1-hour sessions dove deeper into CEnR principles for a self-selected cohort. These small-group sessions involved discussion between faculty and community partners and facilitated small-group discussion. Students completed evaluations after each session. Results A total of 160 students participated in the introductory session; 36 took part in the follow-up series. Survey response rates varied from 38% to 67% for each session. Overall, 87% of students in all sessions felt their session was worthwhile, with 85% of large-group and 96% of small-group respondents reporting they learned something they would use in their practice or profession. Qualitative responses included appreciation for addressing a curricular gap and desire for more time and more sessions to continue discussions. Discussion The program was effective at stimulating medical student self-reported gains in skills, attitudes, and future intentions regarding CEnR in an efficient manner. Effective programs that transfer positive CEnR skills and attitudes to future physicians can promote CEnR within academic medicine. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Community Engagement 
690 |a Community-Based Medicine 
690 |a Diversity 
690 |a Equity 
690 |a Inclusion 
690 |a Medicine (General) 
690 |a R5-920 
690 |a Education 
690 |a L 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n MedEdPORTAL, Vol 19 (2023) 
787 0 |n http://www.mededportal.org/doi/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11350 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2374-8265 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/e19ddbd0af8540778ecd39ae4f783b51  |z Connect to this object online.