INACCURACY OF NONINVASIVE BLOOD PRESSURE MONITOR DEVICES, DO WE HAVE AN ALTERNATIVE?

Background: Blood pressure (BP) is obligatorily measured each time a patient visits Emergency room (ER) or is admitted in ICU/CCU. Accuracy of blood pressure measurement in clinical settings is the key to appropriate diagnosis of hypertension in a patient. It remains elusive, however, whether oscill...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aisha Khan Jadoon (Author), Fasiha Sohail (Author), Arzu Jadoon (Author), Sumera Nawaz Qabulio (Author)
Format: Book
Published: ziauddin University, 2019-04-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_e1c7a3b85c574e3bae48f1052c6cfcfc
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Aisha Khan Jadoon  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Fasiha Sohail  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Arzu Jadoon  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Sumera Nawaz Qabulio  |e author 
245 0 0 |a INACCURACY OF NONINVASIVE BLOOD PRESSURE MONITOR DEVICES, DO WE HAVE AN ALTERNATIVE? 
260 |b ziauddin University,   |c 2019-04-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2313-7371 
500 |a 2308-2593 
520 |a Background: Blood pressure (BP) is obligatorily measured each time a patient visits Emergency room (ER) or is admitted in ICU/CCU. Accuracy of blood pressure measurement in clinical settings is the key to appropriate diagnosis of hypertension in a patient. It remains elusive, however, whether oscillatory automated BP measurement yields lower values than auscultatory manual methods. It has been witnessed that both the devices give different readings of the same patient at one point in time. This study helped to determine the accurate or more reliable of the two devices. Methods: A double-blind randomized clinical cross over trial was carried out at Ziauddin University Hospital from February 2018 to June 2018. Sample of 100 was taken through random sampling. The device used in this study was the Dinamap Procare 100. SPSS 20 was used for data entry and analysis. Results: The mean of difference in systolic manual Blood Pressure (sMBP) and systolic automated Blood Pressure (sABP) was estimated to be 15.62 with a standard deviation of ± 8.57, while the mean of difference in diastolic MBP and ABP was 12.6 with a standard deviation of ± 24.7. Both systolic and diastolic readings were far low by automated devices in comparison to Manual devices. Conclusion: The results of this study suggested that automated method in measurement of BP frequently shows lower BP. This can influence diagnosis of hypertension and management of certain medical conditions. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Blood Pressure Calibration 
690 |a Hypertension 
690 |a Intensive care Unit 
690 |a Emergency room 
690 |a Biochemistry 
690 |a QD415-436 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
690 |a Therapeutics. Pharmacology 
690 |a RM1-950 
690 |a Medicine (General) 
690 |a R5-920 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Pakistan Journal of Medicine and Dentistry, Vol 8, Iss 1 (2019) 
787 0 |n https://ojs.zu.edu.pk/pjmd/article/view/122 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2313-7371 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2308-2593 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/e1c7a3b85c574e3bae48f1052c6cfcfc  |z Connect to this object online.