Artificial intelligent-driven decision-making for automating root fracture detection in periapical radiographs

Abstract Background The detection and early diagnosis of root fractures can be challenging; this difficulty applies particularly to newly qualified dentists. Aside from clinical examination, diagnosis often requires radiographic assessment. Nonetheless, human fallibility can introduce errors due to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Riem Abdelazim (Author), Eman M. Fouad (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Nature Publishing Group, 2024-10-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_e26198ed81f347999b24c829aad8958b
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Riem Abdelazim  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Eman M. Fouad  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Artificial intelligent-driven decision-making for automating root fracture detection in periapical radiographs 
260 |b Nature Publishing Group,   |c 2024-10-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1038/s41405-024-00260-1 
500 |a 2056-807X 
520 |a Abstract Background The detection and early diagnosis of root fractures can be challenging; this difficulty applies particularly to newly qualified dentists. Aside from clinical examination, diagnosis often requires radiographic assessment. Nonetheless, human fallibility can introduce errors due to a lack of experience. Aim The proposed system aimed to assist in detecting root fractures through the integration of artificial intelligence techniques into the diagnosis process as a step for automating dental diagnosis and decision-making processes. Materials and method A total of 400 radiographic images of fractured and unfractured teeth were obtained for the present research. Data handling techniques were implemented to balance the distribution of the samples. The AI-based system used the voting technique for five different pretrained models namely, VGG16, VGG19, ResNet50. DenseNet121, and DenseNet169 to perform the analysis. The parameters used for the analysis of the models are loss and accuracy curves. Results VGG16 exhibited notable success with low training and validation losses (0.09% and 0.18%, respectively), high specificity, sensitivity, and positive predictive value (PPV). VGG19 showed potential overfitting concerns, while ResNet50 displayed progress in minimizing loss but exhibited bias toward unfractured cases. DenseNet121 effectively addressed overfitting and noise issues, achieving balanced metrics and impressive PPVs for both fractured and unfractured cases (0.933 and 0.898 respectively). With increased depth, DenseNet169 demonstrated enhanced generalization capability. Conclusion The proposed AI- based system demonstrated high precision and sensitivity for detecting root fractures in endodontically treated teeth by utilizing the voting method. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n BDJ Open, Vol 10, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2024) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-024-00260-1 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2056-807X 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/e26198ed81f347999b24c829aad8958b  |z Connect to this object online.