Comparison of a mobile application to estimate percentage body fat to other non-laboratory based measurements

• Main Authors: Shaw Matthew P. (Author), Robinson Joshua (Author), Peart Daniel J. (Author)
• Format: Book
• Published: Sciendo, 2017-02-01T00:00:00Z.
• Subjects: article
• Online Access: Connect to this object online.
• Notes: 2080-2234; 10.1515/bhk-2017-0014
• Keywords: mobile technology - field testing - body composition - reproducibility; Sports medicine; RC1200-1245; Physiology; QP1-981
• Source: Biomedical Human Kinetics, Vol 9, Iss 1, Pp 94-98 (2017)

Study aim: The measurement of body composition is important from a population perspective as it is a variable associated with a person's health, and also from a sporting perspective as it can be used to evaluate training. This study aimed to examine the reliability of a mobile application that estimates body composition by digitising a two-dimensional image. Materials and methods: Thirty participants (15 men and 15 women) volunteered to have their percentage body fat (%BF) estimated via three different methods (skinfold measurements, SFM; bio-electrical impedance, BIA; LeanScreenTM mobile application, LSA). Intra-method reproducibility was assessed using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC), coefficient of variance (CV) and typical error of measurement (TEM). The average measurement for each method were also compared. Results: There were no significant differences between the methods for estimated %BF (p = 0.818) and the reliability of each method as assessed via ICC was good (≥0.974). However the absolute reproducibility, as measured by CV and TEM, was much higher in SFM and BIA (≤1.07 and ≤0.37 respectively) compared with LSA (CV 6.47, TEM 1.6). Conclusion: LSA may offer an alternative to other field-based measures for practitioners, however individual variance should be considered to develop an understanding of minimal worthwhile change, as it may not be suitable for a one-off measurement.