Ethical Frameworks and Global Health: A Narrative Review of the "Leave No One Behind" Principle

The "Leave No One Behind" (LNOB) principle, a fundamental commitment of the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals, emphasizes the urgent need to address and reduce global health inequalities. As global health initiatives strive to uphold this principle, they face significant e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniela Oehring PhD (Author), Poorna Gunasekera MSc (Author)
Format: Book
Published: SAGE Publishing, 2024-10-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_e29ca10c27bf4a989ab9cab4d4c037e9
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Daniela Oehring PhD  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Poorna Gunasekera MSc  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Ethical Frameworks and Global Health: A Narrative Review of the "Leave No One Behind" Principle 
260 |b SAGE Publishing,   |c 2024-10-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 0046-9580 
500 |a 1945-7243 
500 |a 10.1177/00469580241288346 
520 |a The "Leave No One Behind" (LNOB) principle, a fundamental commitment of the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals, emphasizes the urgent need to address and reduce global health inequalities. As global health initiatives strive to uphold this principle, they face significant ethical challenges in balancing equity, resource allocation, and diverse health priorities. This narrative review critically examines these ethical dilemmas and their implications for translating LNOB into actionable global health strategies. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Semantic Scholar, covering publications from January 1990 to April 2024. The review included peer-reviewed articles, gray literature, and official reports that addressed the ethical dimensions of LNOB in global health contexts. A thematic analysis was employed to identify and synthesize recurring ethical issues, dilemmas, and proposed solutions. The thematic analysis identified 4 primary ethical tensions that complicate the operationalization of LNOB: (1) Universalism versus Targeting, where the challenge lies in balancing broad health improvements with targeted interventions for the most disadvantaged; (2) Resource Scarcity versus Equity; highlighting the ethical conflicts between maximizing efficiency and ensuring fairness; (3) Top-down versus Bottom-up Approaches, reflecting the tension between externally driven initiatives and local community needs; and (4) Short-term versus Long-term Sustainability, addressing the balance between immediate health interventions and sustainable systemic changes. To navigate these ethical challenges effectively, global health strategies must adopt a nuanced, context-sensitive approach incorporating structured decision-making processes and authentic community participation. The review advocates for systemic reforms that address the root causes of health disparities, promote equitable collaboration between health practitioners and marginalized communities, and align global health interventions with ethical imperatives. Such an approach is essential to truly operationalize the LNOB principle and foster sustainable health equity. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Inquiry: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing, Vol 61 (2024) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580241288346 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/0046-9580 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1945-7243 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/e29ca10c27bf4a989ab9cab4d4c037e9  |z Connect to this object online.