Clinical and radiographic success of TheraCal versus Formocresol in primary teeth pulpotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Various dressing materials have been evaluated for pulpotomy of primary teeth. However, an ideal pulp dressing material has not been identified yet. This systematic review investigated the effectiveness of TheraCal compared to Formocresol in pulpotomy of primary teeth. Materials and meth...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Narjes Amrollahi (Author), Rahele Karimi (Author), Faezeh Shariati (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Elsevier, 2024-08-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_e30b6c4a9ca1411a8d9b77eb244f096f
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Narjes Amrollahi  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Rahele Karimi  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Faezeh Shariati  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Clinical and radiographic success of TheraCal versus Formocresol in primary teeth pulpotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis 
260 |b Elsevier,   |c 2024-08-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1013-9052 
500 |a 10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.06.008 
520 |a Background: Various dressing materials have been evaluated for pulpotomy of primary teeth. However, an ideal pulp dressing material has not been identified yet. This systematic review investigated the effectiveness of TheraCal compared to Formocresol in pulpotomy of primary teeth. Materials and methods: This research was conducted in the form of a secondary study, with a systematic search of texts until 2023 in Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed and Google Scholar databases. The articles were selected based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria and, finally the search results were reported in the PRISMA chart. The quality of the studies was evaluated based on the NIH checklist. The extracted information was entered into Stata17 software. Heterogeneity was evaluated using Cochran's chi-square test and I2 statistics. Egger's tests were used to detect publication bias. Results: After removing duplicate articles and articles that did not meet the inclusion criteria, 4 studies were selected for qualitative analysis. The odds' ratio of success rate between Formocresol and TheraCal pulpotomy for absence of the pain, abscess, Mobility, internal root resorption and bone radiolucency was obtained 1.12 (95 % CI: 0.32, 3.85, P = 0.86), 0.47 (95 % CI: 0.1, 2.14, P = 0.33), 0.82 (95 % CI: 0.21, 3.21, P = 0.78), 0.89 (95 % CI: 0.3, 2.67, P = 0.84), and 1.96 (95 % CI: 0.68, 5.62, P = 0.21) respectively. Conclusion: The study results revealed that there was no significant difference in clinical and radiographic success between pulpotomy with TheraCal and Formocresol. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Pulpotomy 
690 |a Formocresol 
690 |a TheraCal 
690 |a Tooth 
690 |a Deciduous 
690 |a Child 
690 |a Medicine 
690 |a R 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Saudi Dental Journal, Vol 36, Iss 8, Pp 1058-1065 (2024) 
787 0 |n http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013905224001767 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1013-9052 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/e30b6c4a9ca1411a8d9b77eb244f096f  |z Connect to this object online.