Are Cement Spacers and Beads Loaded with the Correct Antibiotic(s) at the Site of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Joint Infections?

The optimal impregnation of antibiotic-loaded bone cement in the treatment of periprosthetic hip and knee joint infection is unknown. It is also unclear, whether a suboptimal impregnation might be associated with a higher persistence of infection. A total of 93 patients (44 knee, 49 hip) were retros...

Szczegółowa specyfikacja

Zapisane w:
Opis bibliograficzny
Główni autorzy: Konstantinos Anagnostakos (Autor), Ismail Sahan (Autor)
Format: Książka
Wydane: MDPI AG, 2021-02-01T00:00:00Z.
Hasła przedmiotowe:
Dostęp online:Connect to this object online.
Etykiety: Dodaj etykietę
Nie ma etykietki, Dołącz pierwszą etykiete!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_e46e59a3f772428fb64c3b7c44aef13a
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Konstantinos Anagnostakos  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Ismail Sahan  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Are Cement Spacers and Beads Loaded with the Correct Antibiotic(s) at the Site of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Joint Infections? 
260 |b MDPI AG,   |c 2021-02-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.3390/antibiotics10020143 
500 |a 2079-6382 
520 |a The optimal impregnation of antibiotic-loaded bone cement in the treatment of periprosthetic hip and knee joint infection is unknown. It is also unclear, whether a suboptimal impregnation might be associated with a higher persistence of infection. A total of 93 patients (44 knee, 49 hip) were retrospectively evaluated, and the most common organism was a methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus epidermidis</i>, followed by methicillin-susceptible <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>. Of all the organisms, 37.1% were resistant against gentamicin and 54.2% against clindamycin. All organisms were susceptible against vancomycin. In 41 cases, gentamicin-loaded beads were inserted and in 52 cases, spacers: (2 loaded only with gentamicin, 18 with gentamicin + vancomycin, 19 with gentamicin + clindamycin, and 13 with gentamicin + vancomycin + clindamycin). The analysis of each antibiotic impregnation showed that complete susceptibility was present in 38.7% of the cases and partial susceptibility in 28%. In the remaining 33.3%, no precise statement can be made because either there was a culture-negative infection or the antibiotic(s) were not tested against the specific organism. At a mean follow-up of 27.9 months, treatment failure was observed in 6.7% of the cases. Independent of which antibiotic impregnation was used, when the organism was susceptible against the locally inserted antibiotics or not tested, reinfection or persistence of infection was observed in the great majority of cases. Future studies about the investigation of the optimal impregnation of antibiotic-loaded bone cement are welcome. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a hip spacer 
690 |a knee spacer 
690 |a antibiotic-loaded bone cement 
690 |a antibiotic-impregnated bone cement 
690 |a infection persistence 
690 |a reinfection 
690 |a Therapeutics. Pharmacology 
690 |a RM1-950 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Antibiotics, Vol 10, Iss 2, p 143 (2021) 
787 0 |n https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/10/2/143 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2079-6382 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/e46e59a3f772428fb64c3b7c44aef13a  |z Connect to this object online.