Physical activity equivalent labeling vs. calorie labeling: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background Many countries are trying to identify strategies to control obesity. Nutrition labeling is a policy that could lead to healthy food choices by providing information to consumers. Calorie labeling, for example, could lead to consumers choosing lower calorie foods. However, its eff...

Olles dieđut

Furkejuvvon:
Bibliográfalaš dieđut
Váldodahkkit: Shirin Seyedhamzeh (Dahkki), Minoo Bagheri (Dahkki), Abbas Ali Keshtkar (Dahkki), Mostafa Qorbani (Dahkki), Anthony J. Viera (Dahkki)
Materiálatiipa: Girji
Almmustuhtton: BMC, 2018-09-01T00:00:00Z.
Fáttát:
Liŋkkat:Connect to this object online.
Fáddágilkorat: Lasit fáddágilkoriid
Eai fáddágilkorat, Lasit vuosttaš fáddágilkora!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_e5fcfa23e34a418faa4fd65e402b0a3c
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Shirin Seyedhamzeh  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Minoo Bagheri  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Abbas Ali Keshtkar  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Mostafa Qorbani  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Anthony J. Viera  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Physical activity equivalent labeling vs. calorie labeling: a systematic review and meta-analysis 
260 |b BMC,   |c 2018-09-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1186/s12966-018-0720-2 
500 |a 1479-5868 
520 |a Abstract Background Many countries are trying to identify strategies to control obesity. Nutrition labeling is a policy that could lead to healthy food choices by providing information to consumers. Calorie labeling, for example, could lead to consumers choosing lower calorie foods. However, its effectiveness has been limited. Recently, physical activity equivalent labeling (i.e., displaying calories in terms of estimated amount of physical activity to burn calories) has been proposed as an alternative to the calorie-only label. The aim of this review was to identify and evaluate the published literature comparing effects on health behavior between physical activity equivalent labeling and calorie-only labeling. Method We searched the following databases: Pubmed/medline, Scopus, Web of science, Agris, Cochrane library, Google Scholar. We also searched along with reference lists of included articles. Articles that were published between 1 January 2000 and 31 October 2016 were eligible for inclusion provided they reported on studies that examined the effects of both types of labeling and included at least one outcome of interest. Mean and standard deviations of the included results were combined using a fixed-effect model. The difference in calories purchased between people exposed to physical activity labeling and calorie-only labeling was calculated as weighted mean difference by using a fixed-effect model. Result The difference of calories ordered between physical activity label and calorie label groups was not statistically significant (SMD: -0.03; 95% CI: -0.13, 0.07). The difference of calories ordered between physical activity label and calorie label according to real vs unreal (e.g. web-based) condition was 65 Kcal fewer in real-world settings. Conclusion Physical activity calorie equivalent labeling in minutes does not significantly reduce calories ordered compared to calorie-only labeling. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Physical activity equivalent labeling 
690 |a Food labeling 
690 |a Calorie labeling 
690 |a Meta-analysis 
690 |a Nutritional diseases. Deficiency diseases 
690 |a RC620-627 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, Vol 15, Iss 1, Pp 1-13 (2018) 
787 0 |n http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12966-018-0720-2 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1479-5868 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/e5fcfa23e34a418faa4fd65e402b0a3c  |z Connect to this object online.