The right to identity: Implications of using subjectively-assigned race in US healthcare
In the US, so-called race descriptors have historically been used to ensure control over enslaved and immigrant groups and classes. This paper examines historical, clinical, statistical, and human rights implications for subjectively-assigned race in US healthcare. When compared to other patient des...
Saved in:
Main Author: | Richard S. Witzig (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Social Medicine Publication Group,
2014-02-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Subjectively-Assigned versus self-reported race and ethnicity in US healthcare
by: Richard S. Witzig, et al.
Published: (2014) -
Socially-assigned race and health: a scoping review with global implications for population health equity
by: Kellee White, et al.
Published: (2020) -
Socially Assigned Race and the Health of Racialized Women and Their Infants
Published: (2022) -
Self-identified race, socially assigned skin tone, and adult physiological dysregulation: Assessing multiple dimensions of "race" in health disparities research
by: Ryon J. Cobb, et al.
Published: (2016) -
Right Above Race
by: Kahn, Otto H., 1867-1934