Supporting Students Reading Complex Texts

The Common Core State Standards (CCSS) require students to read grade-level text with "scaffolding as needed." The current study examines the effectiveness of interactional scaffolding, which is responsive in-person support an expert provides to a novice reader in order to support the read...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dan Reynolds (Author), Amanda Goodwin (Author)
Format: Book
Published: SAGE Publishing, 2016-11-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_e6f50f46960e4870aef39c41c7f0f5b7
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Dan Reynolds  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Amanda Goodwin  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Supporting Students Reading Complex Texts 
260 |b SAGE Publishing,   |c 2016-11-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2332-8584 
500 |a 10.1177/2332858416680353 
520 |a The Common Core State Standards (CCSS) require students to read grade-level text with "scaffolding as needed." The current study examines the effectiveness of interactional scaffolding, which is responsive in-person support an expert provides to a novice reader in order to support the reader's comprehension during reading instruction, for 213 young adolescents learning within a four-lesson small-group guided-reading intervention (N = 196 instructional sessions). The intervention taught students, many of whom were reading below grade level, to use comprehension strategies as they read CCSS-style complex texts. To support student reading, tutors were encouraged to choose from a set of interactional scaffolds to contingently respond to student needs as they arose. Multilevel regression indicated that motivational scaffolding-but not vocabulary, fluency, comprehension or peer scaffolding-predicted growth on standardized reading comprehension. Implications for research and practice are discussed. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Education 
690 |a L 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n AERA Open, Vol 2 (2016) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858416680353 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2332-8584 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/e6f50f46960e4870aef39c41c7f0f5b7  |z Connect to this object online.