A Systematic Review of Digital Competence Evaluation in Higher Education
University students' digital skills depend significantly on educators' proficiency, necessitating regular assessments. Tools like DigComp and the TPACK model are provided in this technological context. A systematic review, following PRISMA criteria, aims to evaluate digital competencies th...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Book |
| Published: |
MDPI AG,
2024-10-01T00:00:00Z.
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | University students' digital skills depend significantly on educators' proficiency, necessitating regular assessments. Tools like DigComp and the TPACK model are provided in this technological context. A systematic review, following PRISMA criteria, aims to evaluate digital competencies through globally used tools. DigCompEdu is prominent, with Spain leading the research, while unvalidated instruments from Asia highlight global disparities. This review will identify key tools and expose geographical and validation gaps, stressing the need for standardized assessments. Understanding the predominance of DigCompEdu and seeing the variation that is generated in Asia highlights the poor ability to transmit self-perceived competencies to learners. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | 10.3390/educsci14111181 2227-7102 |