Developing a Better and More User-Friendly Numeracy Scale for Patients

• Main Authors: W. Trey Hill (Author), Gary L. Brase (Author), Kevin L. Kenney (Author)
• Format: Book
• Published: SLACK Incorporated, 2019-08-01T00:00:00Z.
• Subjects: article
• Online Access: Connect to this object online.

Summary

Background: A person's ability to work with and understand numerical information (i.e., numeracy) is increasingly important in everyday health and other decision-making contexts. Several survey measures of numeracy have been developed to address this trend, including the widely used General Numeracy Scale (GNS), which is thematically focused on health decision-making and is assumed to measure a unidimensional construct of numeracy. Objective: The present research was designed to evaluate this proposed unidimensional structure of general numeracy, for which prior data have given mixed empirical support. Methods: Three samples completed the GNS, in different forms, and responses were analyzed in terms of underlying factor structure. Key Results: We show that both one-factor and four-factor models of numeracy are plausible based on the GNS (Study 1), and then develop a multiple-choice version of the GNS (i.e., the MC-GNS) that demonstrates some increased clarity in factor structure due to the consistent response format (Study 2). A further study evaluated the convergent and discriminant validity of the MC-GNS (Study 3), finding it to be as good as or better than the prior scale. Conclusions: Additionally, the MC-GNS is easier for people to take, likely to be less stressful, and easier for practitioners to score. Collectively, this research identifies a problem with the GNS measure, develops improvements to help address this problem, and in the process creates a way to more easily measure numeracy in practical settings.

Item Description

10.3928/24748307-20190624-01
2474-8307