Current Bioequivalence Study Designs in South Korea: A Comprehensive Analysis of Bioequivalence Study Reports Between 2013 and 2019

• Main Authors: Ki Young Huh (Author), Eunwoo Kim (Author), Soyoung Lee (Author), Hyounggyoon Yoo (Author), Seonghae Yoon (Author), Kyung-Sang Yu (Author), Jae-Yong Chung (Author)
• Format: Book
• Published: Frontiers Media S.A., 2021-05-01T00:00:00Z.
• Subjects: article
• Online Access: Connect to this object online.
• Notes: 1663-9812; 10.3389/fphar.2021.651790
• Keywords: bioequivalence; regulations; generic drug; Intrasubject coefficient of variation; biopharmaceutics classification system; Therapeutics. Pharmacology; RM1-950
• Source: Frontiers in Pharmacology, Vol 12 (2021)

Demonstration of bioequivalence (BE) is mandatory while developing generic drugs. The scientific concept of BE applies equally to different regulatory agencies. However, the application of the concept may differ for each agency, which can affect the design of BE studies. To evaluate the study practices in terms of the BE concept in South Korea, we retrospectively analyzed BE study reports available from Ministry of Food and Drug Safety between 2013 and 2019. Statistical estimation of the pharmacokinetic parameters, including peak concentration and area under the concentration-time curve to the last measurable concentration, as well as study design, number of subjects in a study, study duration, fasting status, and formulation of specific drugs were obtained. The drugs were classified per World Health Organization Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification and Biopharmaceutics Classification System. Post-hoc intrasubject coefficient of variation and corresponding sample sizes were calculated from the 90% confidence intervals of pharmacokinetic parameters. A total of 143 generic drugs in 588 BE studies were analyzed. The largest number of studies were performed in the area of Cardiovascular system (172 studies), followed by Nervous system (143 studies) and Alimentary tract and metabolism (92 studies). Overall, BE studies in South Korea were conducted in accordance with the global guideline despite the differences in details. BE studies were focused on the several therapeutic areas and conducted in a similar manner. The number of subjects was generally larger than that estimated with 90% power.