The Gray Zone: LR3, LR-M, and LR-TIV

The goal of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) is to standardize the lexicon, imaging techniques, interpretation, and reporting of observations in patients with a potential risk for developing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and, consequently, improve communication between radiologist...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Karthik Ganesan (Author), Shivsamb Jalkote (Author), Swarup Nellore (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd., 2023-09-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_e7d88fb2045143fbb9f5ca93f31da036
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Karthik Ganesan  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Shivsamb Jalkote  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Swarup Nellore  |e author 
245 0 0 |a The Gray Zone: LR3, LR-M, and LR-TIV 
260 |b Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.,   |c 2023-09-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2581-9178 
500 |a 10.1055/s-0043-1764401 
520 |a The goal of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) is to standardize the lexicon, imaging techniques, interpretation, and reporting of observations in patients with a potential risk for developing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and, consequently, improve communication between radiologists and physicians. LI-RADS diagnostic algorithms are applied to a population "at risk," follow a stepwise algorithmic approach which categorize and stratify individual observations as HCC, and also assess the likelihood of non-HCC malignancies and tumor in vein. Risk factors for developing HCC have geographical variations, which significantly impact diagnostic and management strategies; however, these variations are not considered in the LIRADS v2018 version. Further, the diagnostic algorithm includes several major and ancillary features, and, tie-breaking rules, which result in numerous probable combinations by which a plausible observation could be assigned a particular category, inherently increasing its complexity. Heterogeneity of the diagnostic algorithm results in certain imaging pitfalls and poses challenges in the precise characterization of observations, complicating its use in routine clinical practice. This article reviews the gray zones which may be encountered in the evaluation of LR-3, LR-M, and LR-TIV observations during routine clinical imaging with contrast-enhanced computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a CT 
690 |a LI-RADS v2018 
690 |a LR-3 
690 |a LR-M 
690 |a LR-TIV 
690 |a MRI 
690 |a Internal medicine 
690 |a RC31-1245 
690 |a Diseases of the digestive system. Gastroenterology 
690 |a RC799-869 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Journal of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology, Vol 06, Iss 03, Pp 185-201 (2023) 
787 0 |n http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0043-1764401 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2581-9178 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/e7d88fb2045143fbb9f5ca93f31da036  |z Connect to this object online.