Comparison of dentin hardness between conventional drill and chemomechanical methods in primary and permanent dentition using nanoindenter
Introduction: Latest theories regarding the rationale of carious dentin removal are beginning to question the amount of tissue that needs to be excavated to successfully treat a carious tooth. It is not always easy to make a decision at which point to stop excavation because there is an apparent lac...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | M Kruthika (Author), K Ramesh (Author), S Shankar (Author), V Suresh Kumar (Author), Arumugam Karthik (Author), P K Sasikumar (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications,
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Chemomechanical versus drilling methods for caries removal: an in vitro study
by: Kemporn KITSAHAWONG, et al.
Published: (2015) -
Evaluation of microhardness of residual dentin in primary molars following caries removal with conventional and chemomechanical techniques: An In vitro Study
by: A Shihab Anwar, et al.
Published: (2017) -
Measuring the hardness via nanoindentation of a fiber-reinforced dental composite in the root canal
by: András Jakab, et al.
Published: (2024) -
Comparison of mechanical and chemomechanical methods of caries removal in deciduous and permanent teeth: A SEM study
by: A Avinash, et al.
Published: (2012) -
Advanced Nanoindentation in Materials
by: Matt Pharr (Ed.)
Published: (2018)