A discussion of the Muscle Tuning and the Preferred Movement Path concepts - comment on Nigg et al.
Nigg and colleagues propose two new paradigms, the Muscle Tuning and the Preferred Movement Path concepts. The purpose of this commentary is to discuss plausibility and challenges of these two concepts. Both concepts are highly plausible from a mechanical point of view and they also go in line with...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Peter Federolf (Author), Aude-Clémence M. Doix (Author), Daniel Jochum (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Bern Open Publishing,
2018-04-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Muscle tuning and preferred movement path: do we need a paradigm shift or should we redefine the old? - comment on Nigg et al.
by: Benedicte Vanwanseele, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Muscle tuning and preferred movement path - a paradigm shift
by: Benno M. Nigg, et al.
Published: (2017) -
New Hypotheses and Unanswered Questions in Running Injury Research - comment on Nigg et al.
by: James Becker
Published: (2018) -
Running impact forces: from half a leg to holistic understanding - comment on Nigg et al.
by: Kenneth P. Clark, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Reconciling new with old injury paradigms and the need to dig deeper - comment on Nigg et al.
by: Max R. Paquette, et al.
Published: (2018)