Are we making a difference in primary care for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities?

Objectives. To examine the impact of the dissemination of guidelines to physicians and of a population-level health communication intervention on the percentage of adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) receiving preventive care through primary care. Methods. Noninstitutionali...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hélène Ouellette-Kuntz (Author), Glenys Smith (Author), Casey Fulford (Author), Virginie Cobigo (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Pan American Health Organization, 2018-09-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_e962638e108e4a37b2643e5d4fe23bcd
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Hélène Ouellette-Kuntz  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Glenys Smith  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Casey Fulford  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Virginie Cobigo  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Are we making a difference in primary care for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities? 
260 |b Pan American Health Organization,   |c 2018-09-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1020-4989 
500 |a 1680-5348 
500 |a 10.26633/RPSP.2018.154 
520 |a Objectives. To examine the impact of the dissemination of guidelines to physicians and of a population-level health communication intervention on the percentage of adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) receiving preventive care through primary care. Methods. Noninstitutionalized adults with IDD in the province of Ontario, Canada, aged 40 to 64 years were matched to Ontarians without such disabilities each fiscal year (FY) from 2003 to 2016. Health administrative data were used to create a composite measure of receipt of recommended preventive primary care. Age-adjusted rates were used to assess trends, and average two-year rate ratios (RRs) and confidence intervals (CIs) were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the interventions. Results. The number of adults with IDD identified ranged from 20 030 in FY 2003 to 28 080 in FY 2016. The percentage of adults with IDD receiving recommended preventive primary care ranged from 43.4% in 2003 to 55.7% in 2015. Men with IDD had a 53.7% increase across the 13 years, while women with IDD only had a 30.9% increase. When evaluating the impact of the interventions, men with IDD were 4% more likely (RR: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.02-1.05) to receive recommended primary care in FY 2015 and FY 2016 as compared to FY 2009 and FY 2010; in contrast, women with IDD were 5% less likely (RR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.93-0.98). A ­comparable drop was observed among women without IDD. Conclusions. Nearly 45% of adults with IDD in Ontario still do not receive recommended preventive care through primary care. Long-term impacts of the interventions introduced in the province may still occur over time, so ongoing monitoring is warranted. Special attention should be given to the preventive care needs of women with IDD. 
546 |a EN 
546 |a ES 
546 |a PT 
690 |a Preventive health services 
690 |a intellectual disabilities 
690 |a primary health care 
690 |a Canada 
690 |a Medicine 
690 |a R 
690 |a Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine 
690 |a RC955-962 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública, Vol 42, Pp 1-10 (2018) 
787 0 |n http://iris.paho.org/xmlui/handle/123456789/49501 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1020-4989 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1680-5348 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/e962638e108e4a37b2643e5d4fe23bcd  |z Connect to this object online.