Effect and mechanisms of reproductive tract infection on oxidative stress parameters, sperm DNA fragmentation, and semen quality in infertile males

Abstract Recent years have seen a rising incidence of male infertility, mostly caused by the decline of sperm quality. The ratio of infertile males to infertile females has escalated from 3:7 in 2013 to current 5:5, which turns male infertility into the research focus of reproductive medicine. This...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kang-Sheng Liu (Author), Xiao-Dong Mao (Author), Feng Pan (Author), Rui Fang An (Author)
Format: Book
Published: BMC, 2021-06-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_ea001eceda2d4d29a2ef2d78a10be96c
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Kang-Sheng Liu  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Xiao-Dong Mao  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Feng Pan  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Rui Fang An  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Effect and mechanisms of reproductive tract infection on oxidative stress parameters, sperm DNA fragmentation, and semen quality in infertile males 
260 |b BMC,   |c 2021-06-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1186/s12958-021-00781-6 
500 |a 1477-7827 
520 |a Abstract Recent years have seen a rising incidence of male infertility, mostly caused by the decline of sperm quality. The ratio of infertile males to infertile females has escalated from 3:7 in 2013 to current 5:5, which turns male infertility into the research focus of reproductive medicine. This study aimed to clarify the effect of reproductive tract infection by ureaplasma urealyticum (UU) and chlamydia trachomatis (CT) on the DNA integrity and routine semen parameters of infertile males. A retrospective study was performed. A total of 259 infertile males who were treated at the Andrological Laboratory Examination and Reproductive Medicine Center in our hospital were analyzed. qRT-PCR was used to examine the infection status of CT and UU. According to the eligibility criteria, we evaluated the semen parameters and biochemical data of 253 men. Based on the results of PCR, the subjects were divided into four groups: Group I (CT positive, 63 cases), Group II (UU positive, 60 cases), Group III (CT positive and UU positive, 62 cases), and Group IV (no infection, 68 cases). DNA fragmentation index (DFI), sperm count, vitality and morphology, elastase level, seminal plasma malondialdehyde (MDA), and total antioxidant capacity (TAC) were assessed. Compared to Group IV, three groups (Group I, Group II and Group III) showed difference in semen volume, proportion of sperm with normal morphology, sperm motility, progressive motility, and vitality (P < 0.05). Compared to Group IV, Group II and Group III showed difference in DFI (P < 0.05). Compared to Group IV, Group II and Group III showed difference in elastase level (P < 0.05). VCL, VSL, VAP, WOB, ROS, TM, HDS showed differences between groups of abnormal/normal WBC (*P < 0.01). UU infection significantly increased the level of seminal leukocytes only in Group II, but not in the other three groups, indicating that UU is a factor to increase the level of seminal leukocytes. Compared with the normal leukocyte group, there were significant differences in total motility, forward motility and normal sperm ratio between the two groups. The proportion of sperm with abnormal morphology (mostly in the head) showed obvious difference between groups of high and normal seminal leukocytic levels. At the same time, in this study, SCGE and SCD verified that leukocytes could damage sperm DNA by increasing ROS, which ultimately affects male fertility. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a DNA fragmentation test 
690 |a Ureaplasma urealyticum 
690 |a Chlamydia trachomatis 
690 |a Semen parameters 
690 |a Malondialdehyde 
690 |a Total antioxidant capacity; single-cell gel electrophoresis; SCD test 
690 |a Gynecology and obstetrics 
690 |a RG1-991 
690 |a Reproduction 
690 |a QH471-489 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, Vol 19, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2021) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-021-00781-6 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1477-7827 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/ea001eceda2d4d29a2ef2d78a10be96c  |z Connect to this object online.