Should we allocate more COVID-19 vaccine doses to non-vaccinated individuals?

Following the approval by the FDA of two COVID-19 vaccines, which are administered in two doses three to four weeks apart, we simulate the effects of various vaccine distribution policies on the cumulative number of infections and deaths in the United States in the presence of shocks to the supply o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zied Ben Chaouch (Author), Andrew W Lo (Author), Chi Heem Wong (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS), 2022-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_ea9a7b3c532e40ae8ce3de648054db8c
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Zied Ben Chaouch  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Andrew W Lo  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Chi Heem Wong  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Should we allocate more COVID-19 vaccine doses to non-vaccinated individuals? 
260 |b Public Library of Science (PLoS),   |c 2022-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2767-3375 
500 |a 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000498 
520 |a Following the approval by the FDA of two COVID-19 vaccines, which are administered in two doses three to four weeks apart, we simulate the effects of various vaccine distribution policies on the cumulative number of infections and deaths in the United States in the presence of shocks to the supply of vaccines. Our forecasts suggest that allocating more than 50% of available doses to individuals who have not received their first dose can significantly increase the number of lives saved and significantly reduce the number of COVID-19 infections. We find that a 50% allocation saves on average 33% more lives, and prevents on average 32% more infections relative to a policy that guarantees a second dose within the recommended time frame to all individuals who have already received their first dose. In fact, in the presence of supply shocks, we find that the former policy would save on average 8, 793 lives and prevents on average 607, 100 infections while the latter policy would save on average 6, 609 lives and prevents on average 460, 743 infections. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n PLOS Global Public Health, Vol 2, Iss 7, p e0000498 (2022) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000498 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2767-3375 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/ea9a7b3c532e40ae8ce3de648054db8c  |z Connect to this object online.