Outcome of mock embryo transfer before the first IVF cycle: A randomized control trial

Background: There is a lack of agreement among fertility specialists with regard to the routine use of mock embryo transfer (MET) before each in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment cycle. While MET may be beneficial with previous difficult embryo transfer cases, its routine use before first IVF cycl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amol Borkar (Author), Amit Shah (Author), Anil Gudi (Author), Roy Homburg (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, 2020-11-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_eafbf73d25454ab79c6ce8f47e17e10d
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Amol Borkar  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Amit Shah  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Anil Gudi  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Roy Homburg  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Outcome of mock embryo transfer before the first IVF cycle: A randomized control trial 
260 |b Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences,   |c 2020-11-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2476-3772 
500 |a 10.18502/ijrm.v13i11.7962 
520 |a Background: There is a lack of agreement among fertility specialists with regard to the routine use of mock embryo transfer (MET) before each in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment cycle. While MET may be beneficial with previous difficult embryo transfer cases, its routine use before first IVF cycle has not been evaluated. Objective: To find out the effect of MET before the first IVF cycle on clinical pregnancy rate. Materials and Methods: This is a single-centre randomized controlled trial with a balanced randomization (1:1), carried out between November 2015 and October 2017, with 200 subjects at Homerton university hospital, London, randomized into either MET or control. The primary outcome was clinical pregnancy rate (detection of heart activity on the ultrasound scan), the secondary outcome measures were live birth rate, miscarriage and multiple pregnancy rates, difficult ETs, rate of blood or mucus on the catheter tip. Results: No significant differences were observed in the baseline or cycle characteristics between the two groups. The clinical pregnancy rate was similar between the MET and control groups based on both intension to treat and per protocol analyses (p = 0.98, p = 0.92, respectively). Additionally, no significant difference was seen in the live birth rate in both groups on intension to treat and per protocol analyses (p = 0.67, p = 0.47), respectively. Conclusion: Our study concludes that MET prior to first IVF cycle may not improve the success rate in young women without risk factors for a difficult embryo transfer. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a ivf, mock embryo transfer, pregnancy outcomes, live birth. 
690 |a Gynecology and obstetrics 
690 |a RG1-991 
690 |a Reproduction 
690 |a QH471-489 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine, Vol 18, Pp 951-960 (2020) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v13i11.7962 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2476-3772 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/eafbf73d25454ab79c6ce8f47e17e10d  |z Connect to this object online.