Toward a theory-led meta-framework for implementing health system resilience analysis studies: a systematic review and critical interpretive synthesis

Abstract Introduction The variety of frameworks and models to describe resilience in the health system has led researchers and policymakers to confusion and the inability to its operationalization. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to create a meta-framework using the Critical Interpretive Sy...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zeynab Foroughi (Author), Parvin Ebrahimi (Author), Aidin Aryankhesal (Author), Mohammadreza Maleki (Author), Shahram Yazdani (Author)
Format: Book
Published: BMC, 2022-02-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_eb2205b9a8b04c7ca0a4bd86b2bc4eee
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Zeynab Foroughi  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Parvin Ebrahimi  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Aidin Aryankhesal  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Mohammadreza Maleki  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Shahram Yazdani  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Toward a theory-led meta-framework for implementing health system resilience analysis studies: a systematic review and critical interpretive synthesis 
260 |b BMC,   |c 2022-02-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1186/s12889-022-12496-3 
500 |a 1471-2458 
520 |a Abstract Introduction The variety of frameworks and models to describe resilience in the health system has led researchers and policymakers to confusion and the inability to its operationalization. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to create a meta-framework using the Critical Interpretive Synthesis method. Method For this purpose, studies that provide theories, models, or frameworks for organizational or health system resilience in humanitarian or organizational crises were systematically reviewed. The search strategy was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus databases. MMAT quality appraisal tool was applied. Data were analysed using MAXQDA 10 and the Meta-ethnography method. Results After screening based on eligibility criteria, 43 studies were reviewed. Data analysis led to the identification of five main themes which constitute different framework dimensions. Health system resilience phases, attributes, tools, and strategies besides health system building blocks and goals are various dimensions that provide a systematic framework for health system resilience analysis. Discussion This study provides a systemic, comprehensive framework for health system resilience analysis. This meta-framework makes it possible to detect the completeness of resilience phases. It examines the system's resilience by its achievements in intermediate objectives (resilience system attributes) and health system goals. Finally, it provides policy solutions to achieve health system resilience using tools in the form of absorptive, adaptive, and transformative strategies. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Health system 
690 |a Resilience 
690 |a Meta-framework 
690 |a Critical interpretive synthesis 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n BMC Public Health, Vol 22, Iss 1, Pp 1-13 (2022) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-12496-3 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1471-2458 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/eb2205b9a8b04c7ca0a4bd86b2bc4eee  |z Connect to this object online.