Evaluation of different desensitizing agents on dentinal tubule occlusion: A scanning electron microscope study

Background: Dentinal hypersensitivity occurs on exposed dentin and depends on the patency of dentinal tubules. The purpose of this study was to evaluate different desensitizing agents on dentinal tubule occlusion by scanning electron microscopy. Materials and Methods: Thirty teeth were collected fro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Saleeta Mushtaq (Author), Rajan Gupta (Author), Parveen Dahiya (Author), Mukesh Kumar (Author), Vrishti Bansal (Author), Sunita R Melwani (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2019-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_eb83e702bfb24a2d8e6b0d6aa4d3c83a
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Saleeta Mushtaq  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Rajan Gupta  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Parveen Dahiya  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Mukesh Kumar  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Vrishti Bansal  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Sunita R Melwani  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Evaluation of different desensitizing agents on dentinal tubule occlusion: A scanning electron microscope study 
260 |b Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications,   |c 2019-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 0976-4003 
500 |a 2231-2293 
500 |a 10.4103/IJDS.IJDS_36_19 
520 |a Background: Dentinal hypersensitivity occurs on exposed dentin and depends on the patency of dentinal tubules. The purpose of this study was to evaluate different desensitizing agents on dentinal tubule occlusion by scanning electron microscopy. Materials and Methods: Thirty teeth were collected from extracted sound maxillary premolars. Samples were sectioned mesiodistally to obtain 30 buccal and 30 lingual surfaces, and enamel was removed in order to simulate hypersensitive dentin. Specimens were randomly divided into four groups. Group 1: 10 samples were coated with Gluma desensitizer, Group 2: 10 samples were coated with VivaSens, Group 3: 10 samples were coated with MS Coat, Group 4: 10 samples each of the contralateral parts of samples were coated with Gluma desensitizer, VivaSens, and MS Coat on which no desensitizing agent was applied, which acted as the controls. All the specimens were examined under SEM, and photomicrographs were evaluated to assess the opening of dentinal tubules in the controls and occlusion of dentinal tubules in their contralateral parts coated with the desensitizing agents. Results: Statistically significant amount of tubules got occluded after the application of MS Coat desensitizer as compared to tubules that got occluded after the application of VivaSens desensitizer and Gluma desensitizer. Conclusion: MS Coat showed better results in the closure of the dentinal tubules, followed by VivaSens and then Gluma desensitizer. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Dentin hypersensitivity 
690 |a desensitizers 
690 |a Gluma desensitizer 
690 |a MS Coat 
690 |a VivaSens 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Indian Journal of Dental Sciences, Vol 11, Iss 3, Pp 121-124 (2019) 
787 0 |n http://www.ijds.in/article.asp?issn=0976-4003;year=2019;volume=11;issue=3;spage=121;epage=124;aulast=Mushtaq 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/0976-4003 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2231-2293 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/eb83e702bfb24a2d8e6b0d6aa4d3c83a  |z Connect to this object online.