Dental Practice Websites in Germany-How Do They Inform about Fluoridation?

Fluoridation (Fl) is effective in preventing caries; however, it is unclear to what extent its use is counteracted by misinformation on the internet. This study aimed to evaluate the information provided on professional websites of German dental practices regarding fluoridation. A systematic search...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Antje Geiken (Author), Mirja Kock (Author), Lisa Banz (Author), Falk Schwendicke (Author), Christian Graetz (Author)
Format: Book
Published: MDPI AG, 2024-03-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_eb92ce6f000340f1aa4bded8d86564f4
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Antje Geiken  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Mirja Kock  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Lisa Banz  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Falk Schwendicke  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Christian Graetz  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Dental Practice Websites in Germany-How Do They Inform about Fluoridation? 
260 |b MDPI AG,   |c 2024-03-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.3390/dj12030065 
500 |a 2304-6767 
520 |a Fluoridation (Fl) is effective in preventing caries; however, it is unclear to what extent its use is counteracted by misinformation on the internet. This study aimed to evaluate the information provided on professional websites of German dental practices regarding fluoridation. A systematic search was performed by two independent examiners, utilizing three search engines, from 10 September 2021 to 11 December 2021. Modified, validated questionnaires (LIDA, DISCERN) were used to evaluate technical and functional aspects, generic quality, and risk of bias. Demographic information and statements about Fl were also collected. The intra- and inter-rater reliability assessments were excellent. Of the 81 websites analyzed, 64 (79%) mentioned Fl, and 31 (38%) indicated it as a primary focus. Most websites met at least 50% of the LIDA (90%) and DISCERN criteria (99%), indicating that the general quality was good. Thirty (37%) of the websites explained the impact of Fl, and forty-five (56%) indicated an opinion (for/against) on Fl. The practice location and the clinical focus were not associated with the overall quality of websites. Only a minority of websites explained the effects of Fl. Taken together, this study highlights that there is a distinct lack of good-quality information on FL. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a fluoride 
690 |a prevention 
690 |a internet 
690 |a dental website 
690 |a medical information 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Dentistry Journal, Vol 12, Iss 3, p 65 (2024) 
787 0 |n https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6767/12/3/65 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2304-6767 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/eb92ce6f000340f1aa4bded8d86564f4  |z Connect to this object online.