Inclusion under the Mental Capacity Act (2005): A review of research policy guidance and governance structures in England and Wales
Abstract Objective To investigate how people with communication and understanding difficulties, associated with conditions such as dementia, autism and intellectual disability, are represented in research guidance supplementary to the Mental Capacity Act (MCA: 2005) in England and Wales. Methods A d...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Wiley,
2021-02-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000 am a22000003u 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | doaj_ec7b47f70b534efd8bf3e3c2d103ca88 | ||
042 | |a dc | ||
100 | 1 | 0 | |a Hayley Ryan |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Rob Heywood |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Oluseyi Jimoh |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Anne Killett |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Peter E Langdon |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Ciara Shiggins |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Karen Bunning |e author |
245 | 0 | 0 | |a Inclusion under the Mental Capacity Act (2005): A review of research policy guidance and governance structures in England and Wales |
260 | |b Wiley, |c 2021-02-01T00:00:00Z. | ||
500 | |a 1369-7625 | ||
500 | |a 1369-6513 | ||
500 | |a 10.1111/hex.13165 | ||
520 | |a Abstract Objective To investigate how people with communication and understanding difficulties, associated with conditions such as dementia, autism and intellectual disability, are represented in research guidance supplementary to the Mental Capacity Act (MCA: 2005) in England and Wales. Methods A documentary survey was conducted. The sample comprised the MCA Code of Practice (CoP: 2007) and 14 multi‐authored advisory documents that were publicly available on the Health Research Authority website. Textual review of key words was conducted followed by summative content analysis. Results Representation of people with communication and understanding difficulties was confined to procedural information and position statements that focused mainly on risk management and protection. Whilst a need to engage potential participants was recognized, guidance provided was imprecise. Conclusions Tensions exist between the protection versus empowerment of people with communication and understanding difficulties in research. The development of structured, evidence‐based guidance is indicated. Patient or public contribution People with communication and understanding difficulties and carers participated in a working group to explore, discuss and interpret the findings. | ||
546 | |a EN | ||
690 | |a capacity | ||
690 | |a Code of Practice | ||
690 | |a communication | ||
690 | |a consent | ||
690 | |a ethics | ||
690 | |a Mental Capacity Act | ||
690 | |a Medicine (General) | ||
690 | |a R5-920 | ||
690 | |a Public aspects of medicine | ||
690 | |a RA1-1270 | ||
655 | 7 | |a article |2 local | |
786 | 0 | |n Health Expectations, Vol 24, Iss 1, Pp 152-164 (2021) | |
787 | 0 | |n https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13165 | |
787 | 0 | |n https://doaj.org/toc/1369-6513 | |
787 | 0 | |n https://doaj.org/toc/1369-7625 | |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doaj.org/article/ec7b47f70b534efd8bf3e3c2d103ca88 |z Connect to this object online. |