Inclusion under the Mental Capacity Act (2005): A review of research policy guidance and governance structures in England and Wales

Abstract Objective To investigate how people with communication and understanding difficulties, associated with conditions such as dementia, autism and intellectual disability, are represented in research guidance supplementary to the Mental Capacity Act (MCA: 2005) in England and Wales. Methods A d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hayley Ryan (Author), Rob Heywood (Author), Oluseyi Jimoh (Author), Anne Killett (Author), Peter E Langdon (Author), Ciara Shiggins (Author), Karen Bunning (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Wiley, 2021-02-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_ec7b47f70b534efd8bf3e3c2d103ca88
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Hayley Ryan  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Rob Heywood  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Oluseyi Jimoh  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Anne Killett  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Peter E Langdon  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Ciara Shiggins  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Karen Bunning  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Inclusion under the Mental Capacity Act (2005): A review of research policy guidance and governance structures in England and Wales 
260 |b Wiley,   |c 2021-02-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1369-7625 
500 |a 1369-6513 
500 |a 10.1111/hex.13165 
520 |a Abstract Objective To investigate how people with communication and understanding difficulties, associated with conditions such as dementia, autism and intellectual disability, are represented in research guidance supplementary to the Mental Capacity Act (MCA: 2005) in England and Wales. Methods A documentary survey was conducted. The sample comprised the MCA Code of Practice (CoP: 2007) and 14 multi‐authored advisory documents that were publicly available on the Health Research Authority website. Textual review of key words was conducted followed by summative content analysis. Results Representation of people with communication and understanding difficulties was confined to procedural information and position statements that focused mainly on risk management and protection. Whilst a need to engage potential participants was recognized, guidance provided was imprecise. Conclusions Tensions exist between the protection versus empowerment of people with communication and understanding difficulties in research. The development of structured, evidence‐based guidance is indicated. Patient or public contribution People with communication and understanding difficulties and carers participated in a working group to explore, discuss and interpret the findings. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a capacity 
690 |a Code of Practice 
690 |a communication 
690 |a consent 
690 |a ethics 
690 |a Mental Capacity Act 
690 |a Medicine (General) 
690 |a R5-920 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Health Expectations, Vol 24, Iss 1, Pp 152-164 (2021) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13165 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1369-6513 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1369-7625 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/ec7b47f70b534efd8bf3e3c2d103ca88  |z Connect to this object online.