Measurement of The Centric Relation-Maximum Intercuspation Difference: MRI Versus The SAM® Mandibular Position Indicator

The aim of this study was to generate normative data about condylar positions and condyle-disc relationship in healthy individuals, and to compare condylar po -sitions on Magnetic Resonance Images (MRI) to articulator generated condylar positions measured with the SAM® Mandibular Position Indicator...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Berna Turası (Author), Sibel Biren (Author), Arzu Arı-Demirkaya (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Galenos Yayinevi, 2006-12-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_ec9f3055bbde4cc2aa5a2013e4f57d8b
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Berna Turası  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Sibel Biren  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Arzu Arı-Demirkaya  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Measurement of The Centric Relation-Maximum Intercuspation Difference: MRI Versus The SAM® Mandibular Position Indicator 
260 |b Galenos Yayinevi,   |c 2006-12-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2528-9659 
500 |a 2148-9505 
500 |a 10.13076/1300-3550-19-3-199 
520 |a The aim of this study was to generate normative data about condylar positions and condyle-disc relationship in healthy individuals, and to compare condylar po -sitions on Magnetic Resonance Images (MRI) to articulator generated condylar positions measured with the SAM® Mandibular Position Indicator (MP!) regarding the difference between condylar positions in centric relation (CR) and maximum intercuspation (MI). The study group consisted of 30 subjects with normal occlusion and clinically healthy temporomandibular joints. Centric occlusion-maximum intercuspation differences were recorded using the SAM® MPI. Subsequent MR images were taken with the mandible in CR and MI, and the difference in condylar position compared to the MPI findings of the same subjects. MRI and MPI data of the same individuals did not coincide (antero-posterior: p=0.000; vertical: p=0.007), and condyles were concentric in 73% and 87% for right and left sides respectively. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a centric occlusion 
690 |a maximum intercuspation 
690 |a mandibular position indicator 
690 |a magnetic resonance imaging 
690 |a temporomandibular joint 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Turkish Journal of Orthodontics, Vol 19, Iss 3, Pp 199-208 (2006) 
787 0 |n  http://www.turkjorthod.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/measurement-of-the-centric-relation-maximum-ntercu/53826  
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2528-9659 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2148-9505 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/ec9f3055bbde4cc2aa5a2013e4f57d8b  |z Connect to this object online.