Comparison of the flexural strength of printed and milled denture base materials

Abstract Background To evaluate the flexural strength of digitally milled and printed denture base materials. Methods The materials tested were Lucitone 199 denture base disc (Dentsply Sirona), AvaDent denture base puck (AvaDent), KeyMill denture base disc (Keystone), Lucitone digital print denture...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shatha Alshali (Author), Ghadeer Basunbul (Author), Anhar Basunbul (Author), Russell Giordano II (Author)
Format: Book
Published: BMC, 2024-08-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_ecc67f6ba7bf49b58cffea9fb1d9c4e9
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Shatha Alshali  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Ghadeer Basunbul  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Anhar Basunbul  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Russell Giordano II  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Comparison of the flexural strength of printed and milled denture base materials 
260 |b BMC,   |c 2024-08-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1186/s12903-024-04695-8 
500 |a 1472-6831 
520 |a Abstract Background To evaluate the flexural strength of digitally milled and printed denture base materials. Methods The materials tested were Lucitone 199 denture base disc (Dentsply Sirona), AvaDent denture base puck (AvaDent), KeyMill denture base disc (Keystone), Lucitone digital print denture base resin (Dentsply Sirona), Formlab denture base resin (Formlabs), and Dentca base resin II (Dentca). Sixty bar-shaped specimens of each material were prepared for flexural strength testing and were divided into five groups: control, thermocycled, fatigue cycled, and repair using two different materials. The flexural strength and modulus were tested using a 3-point bend test performed on an Instron Universal Testing Machine with a 1kN load cell. The specimens were centered under a loading apparatus with a perpendicular alignment. The loading rate was a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Each specimen was loaded with a force until failure occurred. A one-way ANOVA test was used to analyze the data, followed by Tukey's HSD test (α = 0.05). Results The milled materials exhibited higher flexural strength than the printed materials. Thermocycling and fatigue reduce the flexural strengths of printed and milled materials. The repaired groups exhibited flexural strengths of 32.80% and 30.67% of the original flexural strengths of printed and milled materials, respectively. Nevertheless, the type of repair material affected the flexural strength of the printed materials; the composite resin exhibited higher flexural strength values than the acrylic resin. Conclusions The milled denture base materials showed higher flexural strength than the printed ones. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Denture flexural strength 
690 |a Acrylic repair 
690 |a Milled denture 
690 |a Printed denture 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n BMC Oral Health, Vol 24, Iss 1, Pp 1-21 (2024) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04695-8 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1472-6831 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/ecc67f6ba7bf49b58cffea9fb1d9c4e9  |z Connect to this object online.