A systematic review and time-response meta-analysis of the optimal timing of elective caesarean sections for best maternal and neonatal health outcomes
Abstract Background The rate of caesarean sections (CS) has increased in the last decades to about 30% of births in high income countries. Many CSs are electively planned without an urgent medical reason for mother or child. An early CS though may harm the newborn. Our aim was to evaluate the gestat...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Barbara Prediger (Author), Tim Mathes (Author), Stephanie Polus (Author), Angelina Glatt (Author), Stefanie Bühn (Author), Sven Schiermeier (Author), Edmund A. M. Neugebauer (Author), Dawid Pieper (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
BMC,
2020-07-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Are patients willing to accept longer travel times to decrease their risk associated with surgical procedures? A systematic review
by: Stefanie Bühn, et al.
Published: (2020) -
Results of a patient-oriented second opinion program in Germany shows a high discrepancy between initial therapy recommendation and second opinion
by: Jan Weyerstraß, et al.
Published: (2020) -
Second opinion opportunity declined: patient typology and experiences regarding the decision-making process preceding elective surgeries in Germany
by: Susann May, et al.
Published: (2022) -
Does the second opinion directive in Germany reach the patient? A parallel-convergent mixed-methods study
by: Susann May, et al.
Published: (2023) -
The timing of elective caesarean delivery between 2000 and 2009 in England
by: Onwere Chidimma, et al.
Published: (2011)