Facilitators and barriers to the introduction of atrial fibrillation screening in primary care: a qualitative descriptive study of general practitioners in primary care

Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common cardiac arrhythmia, is a major risk factor for stroke. AF is often asymptomatic and, if identified, treatment can be offered that can reduce stroke risk by up to two thirds. AF screening meets many of the Wilson Jungner criteria for screening....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aileen Callanan (Author), Farshid Bayat (Author), Diarmuid Quinlan (Author), Patricia M Kearney (Author), Claire M Buckley (Author), Susan M Smith (Author), Colin P Bradley (Author)
Format: Book
Published: James Cook University, 2023-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_ecf50d158f9b4dfe8f1a818e0f9ae87c
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Aileen Callanan  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Farshid Bayat  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Diarmuid Quinlan  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Patricia M Kearney  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Claire M Buckley  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Susan M Smith  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Colin P Bradley  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Facilitators and barriers to the introduction of atrial fibrillation screening in primary care: a qualitative descriptive study of general practitioners in primary care 
260 |b James Cook University,   |c 2023-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.22605/RRH8135 
500 |a 1445-6354 
520 |a Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common cardiac arrhythmia, is a major risk factor for stroke. AF is often asymptomatic and, if identified, treatment can be offered that can reduce stroke risk by up to two thirds. AF screening meets many of the Wilson Jungner criteria for screening. While AF screening is recommended in clinical practice and internationally, the optimal mode and location for AF screening remains under investigation. Primary care has been identified as a potential setting. This study aimed to identify facilitators and barriers to AF screening from the perspective of GPs.Methods: The study adopted a qualitative descriptive design conducted in the south of Ireland. 58 GPs were invited from the north Cork region to participate in individual interviews at their practices, rural and urban, with a view to recruiting a purposive sample of up to 12 GPs. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using a framework analysis.Results: Eight GPs (four male, four female) from five practices participated. Five GPs were from urban practices and three were from rural practices. Facilitators and barriers were sub-categorised into patient facilitators, practice facilitators, GP facilitators, patient barriers, practice barriers, GP barriers, attitudes to AF screening, willingness to facilitate and priority ranking. All eight participants expressed a willingness to engage in AF screening. Time was the barrier discussed most frequently by all participants along with the need for additional staff. Programme structure was the most discussed facilitator by all participants and patient awareness campaigns.Discussion: Despite barriers to AF screening identified by GPs, there was a significant willingness to engage and identify potential facilitators to support such screening. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Special situations and conditions 
690 |a RC952-1245 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Rural and Remote Health, Vol 23 (2023) 
787 0 |n https://www.rrh.org.au/journal/article/8135/ 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1445-6354 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/ecf50d158f9b4dfe8f1a818e0f9ae87c  |z Connect to this object online.