Patients' lived experiences of self-injectable diabetes treatment: A phenomenological study

Background: A diabetes diagnosis has significant implications and affects the individual's health and social opportunities; it may also carry ethical and cultural consequences, especially when self-injectable treatment is involved. Therefore, it is important to understand lived experiences of p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Frans N. Ndara (Author), Vistolina Nuuyoma (Author)
Format: Book
Published: AOSIS, 2023-09-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_edaab0bbd97c43b19f20569c9c8b2ad8
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Frans N. Ndara  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Vistolina Nuuyoma  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Patients' lived experiences of self-injectable diabetes treatment: A phenomenological study 
260 |b AOSIS,   |c 2023-09-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1025-9848 
500 |a 2071-9736 
500 |a 10.4102/hsag.v28i0.2359 
520 |a Background: A diabetes diagnosis has significant implications and affects the individual's health and social opportunities; it may also carry ethical and cultural consequences, especially when self-injectable treatment is involved. Therefore, it is important to understand lived experiences of patients on self-injectable diabetes treatment to establish initiatives and develop coping mechanisms that may reduce disease morbidity. Aim: This study explored and described patients' lived experiences of self-injectable treatment for diabetes mellitus type 1 and 2. Setting: The study was conducted in the Rundu health district, Kavango east region, Namibia. Method: A phenomenological qualitative design was used. The sample consisted of 10 purposively selected patients on self-injectable treatment and data were collected through unstructured individual interviews. Data analysis followed an interpretative phenomenological approach. Ethical principles were adhered to, including respect for autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence, and justice and ethical clearance was obtained. Results: Self-injectable treatment is cost-effective, promotes self-care, and relieves the burden on nurses and doctors. But it is a lonely journey, causing uncertainty about the future and self-stigmatisation. Moreover, unfamiliarity with injection techniques, challenges in storing medication, and disposing of used needles and other waste were revealed. Conclusion: Patients on self-injectable diabetes treatment have positive and negative lived experiences. It is recommended that family members provide adequate support and that healthcare workers reinforce education on diabetes for these individuals. Contribution: The findings can be used to develop patients' education and training packages, guide the development and implementation of diabetes coping mechanisms, and initiate intersectoral collaboration to assist patients undergoing injectable treatment. 
546 |a AF 
546 |a EN 
690 |a diabetes 
690 |a diabetes mellitus 
690 |a diabetes treatment 
690 |a patients' experiences 
690 |a self-administration 
690 |a self-care 
690 |a self-injection 
690 |a self-management 
690 |a type 1 diabetes 
690 |a type 2 diabetes 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Health SA Gesondheid: Journal of Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, Vol 28, Iss 0, Pp e1-e10 (2023) 
787 0 |n https://hsag.co.za/index.php/hsag/article/view/2359 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1025-9848 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2071-9736 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/edaab0bbd97c43b19f20569c9c8b2ad8  |z Connect to this object online.