Exploring the effects of fitbit incentive on treatment outcomes in veterans undergoing intensive pain rehabilitation program

Abstract Objective This study compares clinical pain outcomes between patients in a pain treatment program that received a Fitbit, to patients that did not. We also explored: (1) cognitive, emotional, and psychological factors that may have impacted the decision to opt in to receiving a Fitbit; and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tiffany Toor (Author), Sarah Palyo (Author), Kathryn Schopmeyer (Author), Alan N. Simmons (Author), Irina A. Strigo (Author)
Format: Book
Published: SpringerOpen, 2024-04-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_ee5a85546e054e60af5f2df21dfa421c
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Tiffany Toor  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Sarah Palyo  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Kathryn Schopmeyer  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Alan N. Simmons  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Irina A. Strigo  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Exploring the effects of fitbit incentive on treatment outcomes in veterans undergoing intensive pain rehabilitation program 
260 |b SpringerOpen,   |c 2024-04-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1186/s41687-024-00721-z 
500 |a 2509-8020 
520 |a Abstract Objective This study compares clinical pain outcomes between patients in a pain treatment program that received a Fitbit, to patients that did not. We also explored: (1) cognitive, emotional, and psychological factors that may have impacted the decision to opt in to receiving a Fitbit; and (2) whether the choice to receive a Fitbit impacted changes in cognitive, emotional, and psychological factors following treatment. Methods Among 58 patients in a multidisciplinary pain treatment program at a Veterans Affairs Healthcare System hospital, 31 patients opted to receive a Fitbit as adjunct treatment, while 27 did not. This study utilized patient-reported and practitioner-collected data from the pain treatment program. Results Compared to the non-Fitbit group, the Fitbit group displayed a significant decrease in average pain intensity, however showed no correlation between Fitbit activity and average pain intensity. Additionally, treatment satisfaction was the only predictor of treatment group, when modeling pre- and post-treatment outcomes changes. Conclusion The implementation of a Fitbit may lead to improved pain intensity. Initial evidence suggests that opting to receive a Fitbit during a pain treatment program indicates treatment engagement leading to greater treatment satisfaction. Future work is needed to verify and expand upon this potential mechanism. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Chronic pain 
690 |a Fitbit 
690 |a Wearable electronic devices 
690 |a Treatment satisfaction 
690 |a Patient satisfaction 
690 |a Pain treatment 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, Vol 8, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2024) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-024-00721-z 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2509-8020 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/ee5a85546e054e60af5f2df21dfa421c  |z Connect to this object online.