Efficacy, Safety And Feasibility Of Antiemetic Prophylaxis With Fosaprepitant, Granisetron And Dexamethasone In Pediatric Patients With Hemato-Oncological Malignancies

Karin Melanie Cabanillas Stanchi,1,* Martin Ebinger,1,* Ulrike Hartmann,2 Manon Queudeville,1 Judith Feucht,1 Michael Ost,1 Marie-Sarah Koch,1 Carmen Malaval,1 Markus Mezger,1 Sarah Schober,1 Simone Weber,1 Sebastian Michaelis,1 Veit Lange,1 Peter Lang,1 Rupert Handgretinger,1 Michaela Döring1 1Depa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cabanillas Stanchi KM (Author), Ebinger M (Author), Hartmann U (Author), Queudeville M (Author), Feucht J (Author), Ost M (Author), Koch MS (Author), Malaval C (Author), Mezger M (Author), Schober S (Author), Weber S (Author), Michaelis S (Author), Lange V (Author), Lang P (Author), Handgretinger R (Author), Döring M (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Dove Medical Press, 2019-09-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_f038ab3f48eb4bf7bdada3f3933f4ea3
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Cabanillas Stanchi KM  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Ebinger M  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Hartmann U  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Queudeville M  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Feucht J  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Ost M  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Koch MS  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Malaval C  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Mezger M  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Schober S  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Weber S  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Michaelis S  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Lange V  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Lang P  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Handgretinger R  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Döring M  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Efficacy, Safety And Feasibility Of Antiemetic Prophylaxis With Fosaprepitant, Granisetron And Dexamethasone In Pediatric Patients With Hemato-Oncological Malignancies 
260 |b Dove Medical Press,   |c 2019-09-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1177-8881 
520 |a Karin Melanie Cabanillas Stanchi,1,* Martin Ebinger,1,* Ulrike Hartmann,2 Manon Queudeville,1 Judith Feucht,1 Michael Ost,1 Marie-Sarah Koch,1 Carmen Malaval,1 Markus Mezger,1 Sarah Schober,1 Simone Weber,1 Sebastian Michaelis,1 Veit Lange,1 Peter Lang,1 Rupert Handgretinger,1 Michaela Döring1 1Department of General Pediatrics, Hematology/Oncology, University Children‘s Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen 72076, Germany; 2University Pharmacy, Eberhard-Karls-University of Tübingen, Tübingen 72076, Germany*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Michaela DöringUniversity Hospital Tübingen - Children’s Hospital, Department I – General Pediatrics, Hematology/Oncology, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 1, Tübingen 72076, GermanyTel +49-(0)7071-2981355Fax +49-(0)7071-295203Email michaela.doering@med.uni-tuebingen.deBackground: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) are a major burden for patients undergoing emetogenic chemotherapy. International guidelines recommend an antiemetic prophylaxis with corticosteroids, 5-HT3R-antagonists and NK1R-antagonists. The NK1R-antagonist fosaprepitant has shown favorable results in pediatric and adult patients. There is little pediatric experience with fosaprepitant.Methods: This non-interventional observation study analyzed 303 chemotherapy courses administered to 83 pediatric patients with a median age of 9 years (2–17 years), who received antiemetic prophylaxis either with fosaprepitant and granisetron with or without dexamethasone (fosaprepitant group/FG; n=41), or granisetron with or without dexamethasone (control group/CG; n=42), during moderately (CINV risk 30–90%) or highly (CINV risk>90%) emetogenic chemotherapy. The two groups’ results were compared with respect to the safety and efficacy of the antiemetic prophylaxis during the acute (0-24hrs after chemotherapy), delayed (>24–120hrs after chemotherapy) and both CINV phases. Laboratory and clinical adverse events were compared between the two cohorts.Results: Adverse events were not significantly different in the two groups (p>0.05). Significantly fewer vomiting events occurred during antiemetic prophylaxis with fosaprepitant in the acute (23 vs 142 events; p<0.0001) and the delayed (71 vs 255 events; p<0.0001) CINV phase. In the control group, the percentage of chemotherapy courses with vomiting was significantly higher during the acute (24%/FG vs 45%/CG; p<0.0001) and delayed CINV phase (28%/FG vs 47%/CG; p=0.0004). Dimenhydrinate (rescue medication) was administered significantly more often in the CG, compared to the FG (114/FG vs 320/CG doses; p<0.0001). Likewise, in the control group, dimenhydrinate was administered in significantly more (p<0.0001) chemotherapy courses during the acute and delayed CINV phases (79 of 150; 52.7%), compared to the fosaprepitant group (45 of 153; 29.4%).Conclusion: Antiemetic prophylaxis with fosaprepitant and granisetron with or without dexamethasone was well tolerated, safe and effective in pediatric patients. However, larger prospective trials are needed to evaluate these findings.Keywords: fosaprepitant, granisetron, pediatric, antiemetic prophylaxis, chemotherapy induced vomiting, children 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Fosaprepitant 
690 |a aprepitant 
690 |a granisetron 
690 |a pediatric 
690 |a antiemetic prophylaxis 
690 |a chemotherapy 
690 |a CINV 
690 |a chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting 
690 |a chemotherapy induced vomiting 
690 |a CIV 
690 |a 5-HT¬3R-antagonist 
690 |a NK1R-antagonists 
690 |a dexamethasone 
690 |a Therapeutics. Pharmacology 
690 |a RM1-950 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Drug Design, Development and Therapy, Vol Volume 13, Pp 3439-3451 (2019) 
787 0 |n https://www.dovepress.com/efficacy-safety-and-feasibility-of-antiemetic-prophylaxis-with-fosapre-peer-reviewed-article-DDDT 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1177-8881 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/f038ab3f48eb4bf7bdada3f3933f4ea3  |z Connect to this object online.