Efficacy of Topical Ethyl Chloride Spray versus Subcutaneous 1% Lidocaine Injection in Reducing Pain from One Rod System Implant Insertion
Objectives: To compare the efficacy of topical ethyl chloride spray and subcutaneous 1% lidocaine injection in reducing pain from one rod system implant insertion.Materials and Methods: Eighty-four women undergoing one rod implant insertion during February 2014 to December 2015 were enrolled and ran...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
The Royal Thai College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists,
2017-12-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000 am a22000003u 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | doaj_f1709ec0a89649c2a2c794fb6bb944ab | ||
042 | |a dc | ||
100 | 1 | 0 | |a Monthinee Techasomboon |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Rujira Wattanayingcharoenchai |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Jittima Manonai Bartlett |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Komkrit Aimjirakul |e author |
245 | 0 | 0 | |a Efficacy of Topical Ethyl Chloride Spray versus Subcutaneous 1% Lidocaine Injection in Reducing Pain from One Rod System Implant Insertion |
260 | |b The Royal Thai College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, |c 2017-12-01T00:00:00Z. | ||
500 | |a https://doi.org/10.14456/tjog.2017.35 | ||
500 | |a 0857-6084 | ||
500 | |a 0857-6084 | ||
520 | |a Objectives: To compare the efficacy of topical ethyl chloride spray and subcutaneous 1% lidocaine injection in reducing pain from one rod system implant insertion.Materials and Methods: Eighty-four women undergoing one rod implant insertion during February 2014 to December 2015 were enrolled and randomly allocated to ethyl chloride spray and 1% lidocaine injection groups. After skin was sterilized, the assigned anesthetic method was administered before insertion of one rod implant according to the standard pro-cedure. Pain during anesthetic administration, implant insertion, 20 min after insertion, and overall pain were evaluated, using a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS). Patient and doctor satisfaction were measured using a five-point Likert scale.Results: All basis clinical characteristics between two groups did not differ. There was no significant difference in VAS during and 20 min after implant insertion between 2 anesthetic groups (p > 0.05). Median VAS during anesthetic administration and overall pain in ethyl chloride spray group (1.50 and 1.60) were significant lower than lidocaine injection group (3.75 and 2.75) (p < 0.01). Patient and doctor satisfaction scores were significant higher in ethyl chloride spray group (p < 0.05).Conclusion: Ethyl chloride spray can be used as anesthetic option for one rod system implant insertion. It provides comparable analgesic effect to lidocaine injection but with less pain from anesthetic administration. | ||
546 | |a EN | ||
690 | |a ethyl chloride spray | ||
690 | |a lidocaine | ||
690 | |a one rod system implant | ||
690 | |a Gynecology and obstetrics | ||
690 | |a RG1-991 | ||
655 | 7 | |a article |2 local | |
786 | 0 | |n Thai Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vol 25, Iss 4, Pp 266-274 (2017) | |
787 | 0 | |n https://tci-thaijo.org/index.php/tjog/article/download/67674/86571/ | |
787 | 0 | |n https://doaj.org/toc/0857-6084 | |
787 | 0 | |n https://doaj.org/toc/0857-6084 | |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doaj.org/article/f1709ec0a89649c2a2c794fb6bb944ab |z Connect to this object online. |