Autonomy of the family in the modern world

RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to understand autonomy of the family in the 'modern' world by locating the family in the historical changes that led to its present form. The autonomy of the family was shaped in two ways, as collective mentalitiés and as private space. T...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nidhi Gulati (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Jesuit University Ignatianum in Krakow, 2017-06-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_f1e09b4e8e64434789030a39b4e4dccf
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Nidhi Gulati  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Autonomy of the family in the modern world 
260 |b Jesuit University Ignatianum in Krakow,   |c 2017-06-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1643-9171 
500 |a 2391-9485 
520 |a RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to understand autonomy of the family in the 'modern' world by locating the family in the historical changes that led to its present form. The autonomy of the family was shaped in two ways, as collective mentalitiés and as private space. THE RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: The present research problem concerns an important inquiry into the private space of the family and the role of the state in shaping and governing the individual by intervening in the family. The paper uses the method of historical inquiry and analysis of reference literature. THE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: After having defined the aim of the study and the fundamental concepts (modernity, autonomy, mentalitiés) there has been presented the psychogenic history of the family in the context of France. This is followed by the presentation of changes in mentalitiés and private space in the family, with a special emphasis on the changing focus on the child in the family. The essential part of the argumentation was also to build the concept of autonomy through the changes in mentalitiés and private space that unfolds in three stages of the psychogenic history of the family. RESEARCH RESULTS: The result of this argumentation is the autonomous space of the family in the modern times, which is impacted by the state and popular culture. CONCLUSIONS, INNOVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: This analysis confirms the changes of autonomy in the family from the middle, to the modern and across the contemporary times through the conceptions of (i) collective mentalitiés, (ii) private space and sociability and (iii) governmentality. It argues that ever since the turn of the modern, the family has never been autonomous, though in law it appears to be a 'private space'. Family in the contemporary times is insidiously governed by messages and images that circulate in media. Autonomy of the modern family has always been under threat. The arguments point to the necessity to question and problematize the contemporary conceptions of family and the child as mirrored in the domain of popular culture. 
546 |a DE 
546 |a EN 
546 |a ES 
546 |a FR 
546 |a IT 
546 |a PL 
690 |a private space 
690 |a mentalité 
690 |a governmentality 
690 |a autonomy of family 
690 |a segregation of children 
690 |a Education 
690 |a L 
690 |a Social Sciences 
690 |a H 
690 |a Sociology (General) 
690 |a HM401-1281 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Horyzonty Wychowania, Vol 16, Iss 37 (2017) 
787 0 |n https://horyzonty.ignatianum.edu.pl/HW/article/view/1099 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1643-9171 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2391-9485 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/f1e09b4e8e64434789030a39b4e4dccf  |z Connect to this object online.