A blank check or a global public good? A qualitative study of how ethics review committee members in Colombia weigh the risks and benefits of broad consent for data and sample sharing during a pandemic.
Broad consent for future use facilitates the reuse of participant-level data and samples, which can conserve limited resources by confirming research findings and facilitate the development and evaluation of public health and clinical advances. Ethics review committees (ERCs) have to balance differe...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | María Consuelo Miranda Montoya (Author), Jackeline Bravo Chamorro (Author), Luz Marina Leegstra (Author), Deyanira Duque Ortiz (Author), Lauren Maxwell (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS),
2022-01-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
A blank check or a global public good? A qualitative study of how ethics review committee members in Colombia weigh the risks and benefits of broad consent for data and sample sharing during a pandemic
by: María Consuelo Miranda Montoya, et al.
Published: (2022) -
"How about me giving blood for the COVID vaccine and not being able to get vaccinated?" A cognitive interview study on understanding of and agreement with broad consent for future use of data and samples in Colombia and Nicaragua.
by: Lauren Maxwell, et al.
Published: (2023) -
Blank?
by: Garrett, Randall, 1927-1987; Engle, Robert, 1928- [Illustrator] -
Informed consent for neonatal trials: practical points to consider and a check list
by: Donato Bonifazi, et al.
Published: (2020) -
From the Desk of the Journal Committee Member
by: Dara Balaji Gandhi Babu
Published: (2014)