Incisional pyoderma gangrenosum after caesarean section: Two case reports

Introduction: Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) in pregnant women is rare and resembles surgical site infection (SSI). Here we present two cases of PG after caesarean section. Case 1: A 29-year-old woman, who had a history of recurrent wound dehiscence after surgery, exhibited wound ulceration and exudate 6...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tsuyoshi Murata (Author), Hyo Kyozuka (Author), Toma Fukuda (Author), Tsuyoshi Hiraiwa (Author), Akiko Yamaguchi (Author), Keiya Fujimori (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Elsevier, 2019-07-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Introduction: Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) in pregnant women is rare and resembles surgical site infection (SSI). Here we present two cases of PG after caesarean section. Case 1: A 29-year-old woman, who had a history of recurrent wound dehiscence after surgery, exhibited wound ulceration and exudate 6 days after caesarean section. Antibiotics were ineffective and multiple wound cultures were negative. Skin biopsy indicated PG and oral steroid administration resulted in wound improvement. Case 2: A 27-year-old woman, who had a history of PG, exhibited wound ulceration and exudate 5 days after caesarean section. The lesion developed despite antibiotic administration, and multiple wound cultures were negative. Skin biopsy indicated PG and the wound improved after oral steroid administration. Discussion: Definitive diagnosis of PG is essential because its treatment differs from that of SSI. PG after caesarean section can be misdiagnosed as SSI, even when there is a history of wound dehiscence or PG. Keywords: Pyoderma gangrenosum, Caesarean section
Item Description:2214-9112
10.1016/j.crwh.2019.e00128