Validation of the German version of the pregnancy-related anxiety scale (PrAS): psychometric properties across all trimesters of pregnancy

Abstract Background Pregnancy-related anxiety has received greater research attention recently given its association with adverse outcomes (e.g., negative birth experiences). The Pregnancy-related Anxiety Scale (PrAS) offers the possibility to assess pregnancy-related anxiety, but no German version...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tobias Weigl (Author), Robyn Brunton (Author), Rachel Dryer (Author), Susan Garthus-Niegel (Author)
Format: Book
Published: BMC, 2023-06-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_f435b3e20e90449baf1ae2cf6b51233d
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Tobias Weigl  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Robyn Brunton  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Rachel Dryer  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Susan Garthus-Niegel  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Validation of the German version of the pregnancy-related anxiety scale (PrAS): psychometric properties across all trimesters of pregnancy 
260 |b BMC,   |c 2023-06-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1186/s12884-023-05787-z 
500 |a 1471-2393 
520 |a Abstract Background Pregnancy-related anxiety has received greater research attention recently given its association with adverse outcomes (e.g., negative birth experiences). The Pregnancy-related Anxiety Scale (PrAS) offers the possibility to assess pregnancy-related anxiety, but no German version is available. Therefore, the aim of this study was to validate a German version of the PrAS, a comprehensive measure with eight dimensions. Methods Pregnant women of any parity or gestation completed an online survey consisting of the PrAS, PRAQ-R2, and measures of anxiety, depression, and resilience. The PrAS was translated into German (PrAS-G) using the back-translation method. Data were subjected to confirmatory factor analysis and inferential statistics. Results Complete data were provided by 443 women. Participants were predominantly German nationals, partnered, and well-educated with a planned pregnancy. Approximately half were nulliparous. The eight-factor model was well fitting and consistent with the development of the original PrAS. Criterion-related validity was demonstrated by strong correlations with similar measures (PRAQ-R2, anxiety, and depression) and lower correlations with resilience scores. Predictive validity was shown by group comparisons for: planned versus unplanned pregnancy, trimester, and parity. Conclusions The PrAS-G provides a broader assessment of pregnancy-related anxiety than existing measures. Initial evaluation has demonstrated convergent, divergent, and predictive validity, excellent internal consistency, and good model fit indicating promising psychometric properties. The PrAS-G offers a comprehensive assessment of pregnancy-related anxiety which will enable tailored interventions aiming to improve birth experience and well-being of expectant mothers. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Pregnancy 
690 |a Anxiety 
690 |a Screening 
690 |a Psychometric properties 
690 |a Questionnaire 
690 |a Gynecology and obstetrics 
690 |a RG1-991 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, Vol 23, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2023) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05787-z 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1471-2393 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/f435b3e20e90449baf1ae2cf6b51233d  |z Connect to this object online.