Using Continuing Professional Development with Portfolio in a Pharmaceutics Course

The introduction of Continuing Professional Development (CPD) to encourage individual life-long learning as a way of maintaining professional competency in pharmacy has faced resistance. To investigate ways to address this barrier we included CPD with portfolio in a university Pharmaceutics course....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jennifer Schneider (Author), Kate O'Hara (Author), Irene Munro (Author)
Format: Book
Published: MDPI AG, 2016-11-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_f45d487d13b241ed8b25b0102e4cd33e
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Jennifer Schneider  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Kate O'Hara  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Irene Munro  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Using Continuing Professional Development with Portfolio in a Pharmaceutics Course 
260 |b MDPI AG,   |c 2016-11-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2226-4787 
500 |a 10.3390/pharmacy4040036 
520 |a The introduction of Continuing Professional Development (CPD) to encourage individual life-long learning as a way of maintaining professional competency in pharmacy has faced resistance. To investigate ways to address this barrier we included CPD with portfolio in a university Pharmaceutics course. Underpinning knowledge for the course was delivered using a flipped classroom approach and students used the CPD model to address clinical scenarios presented in a simulated pharmacy setting. Students produced portfolio items for the different case scenarios and submitted these for assessment. This provided the opportunity for students to carry out repeated application of the CPD cycle and, in so doing, develop skills in critical thinking for self-reflection and self-evaluation. This course was designed to encourage the development of higher level learning skills for future self-directed learning. Thirty six students submitted a completed portfolio. Twenty nine students achieved a result of >70%, five students scored between 57%-69%, one student obtained a mark of 50% and one student failed. The end of course survey revealed that while students found portfolio development challenging (40%), they also reported that it was effective for self-learning (54%). Differentiating between the concepts "reflection" and "evaluation" in CPD was problematic for some students and the use of clearer, simpler language should be used to explain these processes in future CPD work. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a continuing professional development 
690 |a flipped classroom 
690 |a critical thinking 
690 |a simulation 
690 |a self-directed learning 
690 |a Pharmacy and materia medica 
690 |a RS1-441 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Pharmacy, Vol 4, Iss 4, p 36 (2016) 
787 0 |n http://www.mdpi.com/2226-4787/4/4/36 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2226-4787 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/f45d487d13b241ed8b25b0102e4cd33e  |z Connect to this object online.