Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Community-Based Telewellness Weight Loss Program

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of the Koa Family Program, a community-based telewellness weight reduction intervention for overweight and obese women aged 21-45 years with low income. The Koa Family Program resulted in an approximately 8-pound we...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jeffrey S. Hoch, MA, PhD (Author), Neal D. Kohatsu, MD, MPH (Author), Julia Fleuret, MPH (Author), Desiree R. Backman, DrPH, MS, RD (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Elsevier, 2024-04-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_f473843691a247dfa1a1f7c31c9b9f9c
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Jeffrey S. Hoch, MA, PhD  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Neal D. Kohatsu, MD, MPH  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Julia Fleuret, MPH  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Desiree R. Backman, DrPH, MS, RD  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Community-Based Telewellness Weight Loss Program 
260 |b Elsevier,   |c 2024-04-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2773-0654 
500 |a 10.1016/j.focus.2024.100182 
520 |a Introduction: The purpose of this study was to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of the Koa Family Program, a community-based telewellness weight reduction intervention for overweight and obese women aged 21-45 years with low income. The Koa Family Program resulted in an approximately 8-pound weight loss as demonstrated in an RCT published previously. Methods: Estimates for the cost-effectiveness were derived from the prospective 25-week RCT including 70 women (25 kg/m2≤BMI<40 kg/m2). The analysis was from a program-funder perspective. Base case costs, as well as low and high scenario costs, were estimated from the services provided to intervention participants. The incremental costs were compared with the incremental effectiveness, with weight loss being the outcome of interest. Costs were in 2021 U.S. dollars. Cost-effectiveness was assessed using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio and the incremental net benefit. The statistical uncertainty was characterized using an incremental net benefit by willingness-to-pay plot and a cost-effectiveness acceptability curve. Results: The base case average cost per participant was $564.39. The low and high scenario average costs per participant were $407.34 and $726.22, respectively. Over the 25-week study timeframe, participants lost an average 7.7 pounds, yielding a base case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of approximately $73 per extra pound lost. The probability that the Koa Family Program is cost-effective is 90%, assuming a willingness-to-pay of $115 for a 1-pound reduction, and is 95%, assuming a willingness-to-pay of $140. Conclusions: The Koa Family Program provides good value with cost-effectiveness in line with other weight-loss interventions. This is a striking finding given that the Koa Family Program serves a more vulnerable population than is typically engaged in weight loss research studies. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Cost-effectiveness 
690 |a weight loss 
690 |a obesity 
690 |a women 
690 |a low-income 
690 |a telewellness 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n AJPM Focus, Vol 3, Iss 2, Pp 100182- (2024) 
787 0 |n http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773065424000014 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2773-0654 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/f473843691a247dfa1a1f7c31c9b9f9c  |z Connect to this object online.