Role of inferior vena cava assessment in volume management in acute kidney injury patients

Abstract Background Intravascular volume assessment is critical to guiding volume management in patients with acute kidney injury (AKI). This study aimed to compare the impact of using inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter and collapsibility index (IVC-CI) measurements versus clinical assessment on the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ahmed ElSaeed AbdulGalil (Author), Aya Fathi Abdelhalem (Author), Ahmed Ahmed Eldeeb (Author)
Format: Book
Published: SpringerOpen, 2024-04-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_f4a2e30d256e44efa81b8953ed221d4f
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Ahmed ElSaeed AbdulGalil  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Aya Fathi Abdelhalem  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Ahmed Ahmed Eldeeb  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Role of inferior vena cava assessment in volume management in acute kidney injury patients 
260 |b SpringerOpen,   |c 2024-04-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1186/s43162-024-00310-y 
500 |a 2090-9098 
520 |a Abstract Background Intravascular volume assessment is critical to guiding volume management in patients with acute kidney injury (AKI). This study aimed to compare the impact of using inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter and collapsibility index (IVC-CI) measurements versus clinical assessment on the management of volume status and improvement of renal function in patients with AKI. Methods This prospective comparative study included 88 patients with AKI or AKI on top of chronic kidney disease (CKD) who were randomly allocated into two groups: In group 1, volume status was managed according to IVC assessment, while in group 2, volume status was managed according to clinical assessment. In addition, group 1 patients were assessed clinically and compared with IVC measurements in the same group. Results There was moderate agreement between the IVC and clinical methods in diagnosing 86.4% of patients (P < 0.001) within group 1. The percentage of patients with edema increased post-treatment in group 2. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding renal recovery and survival. Conclusion Bedside ultrasonographic IVC assessment is a non-invasive method that can facilitate volume management in AKI patients, helping to administer fluids more wisely without unintended excess fluid administration. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Acute kidney injury 
690 |a Volume assessment 
690 |a Inferior vena cava diameter 
690 |a Collapsibility index 
690 |a Internal medicine 
690 |a RC31-1245 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n The Egyptian Journal of Internal Medicine, Vol 36, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2024) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.1186/s43162-024-00310-y 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2090-9098 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/f4a2e30d256e44efa81b8953ed221d4f  |z Connect to this object online.