The patient patient: The importance of knowing your navigator

In Ontario, Diagnostic Assessment Programs (DAPs) have been implemented to improve the quality of care patients receive during the diagnostic phase of the cancer journey. Patient navigators play a critical role in this model by coordinating care and providing information and support to patients and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sarah Wheeler (Author), Julie Gilbert (Author), Melissa Kaan (Author), Eric Klonikowski (Author), Claire Holloway (Author)
Format: Book
Published: The Beryl Institute, 2015-11-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_f5836c1fbdfd49e88cc12b911cb4e4a2
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Sarah Wheeler  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Julie Gilbert  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Melissa Kaan  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Eric Klonikowski  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Claire Holloway  |e author 
245 0 0 |a The patient patient: The importance of knowing your navigator 
260 |b The Beryl Institute,   |c 2015-11-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2372-0247 
520 |a In Ontario, Diagnostic Assessment Programs (DAPs) have been implemented to improve the quality of care patients receive during the diagnostic phase of the cancer journey. Patient navigators play a critical role in this model by coordinating care and providing information and support to patients and their families. The objectives of this study were 1) to determine whether patient navigation in DAPs is associated with a better patient experience and 2) to examine whether patient navigation in DAPs modifies the effect of wait times and patient volumes on patient experience. Data reflecting patients' experience within the DAP were collected via survey and an average experience score was calculated for each region. To ascertain the relationship between patient experience, wait times and volumes, correlation coefficients were computed between regional patient experience scores and total regional patient volumes and between regional patient experience score and regional diagnostic wait times. To understand the impact of navigators on the patient experience, the sample was subdivided according to whether or not the respondent reported knowing their navigator. Patients who knew their navigator rated their experience significantly better than those who did not. For those who did not know their navigator, there was an inverse and significant correlation between patient experience scores and wait times; patients in regions with long waits had poorer experience scores overall. Patients who knew their navigator reported consistently good experience regardless of their diagnostic wait. The navigator appears to mitigate the negative impact of longer wait times on experience. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a patient experience 
690 |a lung cancer 
690 |a diagnostic assessment 
690 |a patient navigation 
690 |a Medicine (General) 
690 |a R5-920 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Patient Experience Journal (2015) 
787 0 |n https://pxjournal.org/journal/vol2/iss2/12 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2372-0247 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/f5836c1fbdfd49e88cc12b911cb4e4a2  |z Connect to this object online.