Children's accounts of labelling and stigmatization in private schools in Delhi, India and the Right to Education Act

India's Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 compels private schools to reserve a proportion of their seats for free for disadvantaged children. Although controversial, it is idealized as an equity measure for inclusion in and through education. This small-scale study, f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael Lafleur (Author), Prachi Srivastava (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Arizona State University, 2019-10-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_f5d9c9070e3e4532b21f31327a46e2e5
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Michael Lafleur  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Prachi Srivastava  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Children's accounts of labelling and stigmatization in private schools in Delhi, India and the Right to Education Act 
260 |b Arizona State University,   |c 2019-10-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1068-2341 
500 |a 10.14507/epaa.27.4377 
520 |a India's Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 compels private schools to reserve a proportion of their seats for free for disadvantaged children. Although controversial, it is idealized as an equity measure for inclusion in and through education. This small-scale study, feeding into a larger research project, details children's accounts of their everyday lived experiences at private schools in Delhi. Children reported labelling students by teachers as 'naughty' or academically 'weak' or 'incapable' as a pervasive practice. These 'designated identities' (Sfard Prusak, 2005) were reinforced by teachers and through peer interactions. They were internalized by participants about their peers and affected how they interacted with them. Peers who were labelled were reported to be stigmatized. Surprisingly, neither caste nor gender were mentioned as explicitly marking participant experiences. The paper also discusses the participatory methods employed in the study as a further contribution to the literature on private schooling. Data are from participatory 'draw-and-talk' sessions conducted with 16 children in 2015-16 from marginalized backgrounds, accessing six different private schools in one catchment area, half of whom secured a free private school seat. Participants were from amongst the first cohorts eligible for the free seats provision. 
546 |a EN 
546 |a ES 
546 |a PT 
690 |a exclusion 
690 |a private schools 
690 |a india 
690 |a children's experiences 
690 |a participatory research 
690 |a Education 
690 |a L 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Education Policy Analysis Archives, Vol 27, Iss 0 (2019) 
787 0 |n https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/4377 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1068-2341 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/f5d9c9070e3e4532b21f31327a46e2e5  |z Connect to this object online.