Nursing Education in a Real-Life Context: The Teaching Ward Round

Education in nursing is continually changing. The didactic methods used in other fields may be useful for closing the gap between theoretical learning and the reality of practical nursing. This study aimed to determine the association between a teaching model centered on the reality of nursing care,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Juan Miguel Martínez-Galiano (Author), Laura Parra-Anguita (Author), Miguel Delgado-Rodríguez (Author), Manuel González-Cabrera (Author)
Format: Book
Published: MDPI AG, 2021-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_f62bfec6b68e4f92bf2e7061f1b0e813
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Juan Miguel Martínez-Galiano  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Laura Parra-Anguita  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Miguel Delgado-Rodríguez  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Manuel González-Cabrera  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Nursing Education in a Real-Life Context: The Teaching Ward Round 
260 |b MDPI AG,   |c 2021-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.3390/nursrep11010005 
500 |a 2039-4403 
500 |a 2039-439X 
520 |a Education in nursing is continually changing. The didactic methods used in other fields may be useful for closing the gap between theoretical learning and the reality of practical nursing. This study aimed to determine the association between a teaching model centered on the reality of nursing care, which is individualized to each context, and knowledge acquisition. A controlled experimental study was conducted with random allocation to two groups of students in their second year of a nursing degree (University of Jaén). The control group undertook practical work placements according to the traditional model. The intervention group participated in a "teaching round" during their practical placements. Knowledge tests were conducted after the placements. No significant differences were found for age or education level between the students of the control group (<i>n</i> = 46) and the intervention group (<i>n</i> = 48). In terms of the association between participation in the teaching round and the knowledge test (maximum score of 10), the mean grade in the intervention group was 8.83 ± 0.22, while it was 7.68 ± 0.23 in the control group (<i>p</i> = 0.001). The teaching round increased the student's acquisition of knowledge, even though this was not reflected in the global grade of the course. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a innovation 
690 |a nursing 
690 |a nursing training 
690 |a teaching methodology 
690 |a teaching rounds 
690 |a Nursing 
690 |a RT1-120 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Nursing Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 45-53 (2021) 
787 0 |n https://www.mdpi.com/2039-4403/11/1/5 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2039-439X 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2039-4403 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/f62bfec6b68e4f92bf2e7061f1b0e813  |z Connect to this object online.