Factors associated with nonresponse to ovulation induction using letrozole among women with World Health Organization group II anovulation

Context: Letrozole, a third generation aromatase inhibitor is gaining importance in ovulation induction. Some prefer to use it as a second line agent in women who fail to respond to clomifene citrate. However, our knowledge about the predictors of response to letrozole is limited. Aims: The study wa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thilina Sanjeewa Palihawadana (Author), Prasantha Sudehana Wijesinghe (Author), Harshalal Rukka Seneviratne (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2015-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_f6eb4cde008d4afdb9c47d49b697ecf4
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Thilina Sanjeewa Palihawadana  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Prasantha Sudehana Wijesinghe  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Harshalal Rukka Seneviratne  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Factors associated with nonresponse to ovulation induction using letrozole among women with World Health Organization group II anovulation 
260 |b Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications,   |c 2015-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 0974-1208 
500 |a 1998-4766 
500 |a 10.4103/0974-1208.158598 
520 |a Context: Letrozole, a third generation aromatase inhibitor is gaining importance in ovulation induction. Some prefer to use it as a second line agent in women who fail to respond to clomifene citrate. However, our knowledge about the predictors of response to letrozole is limited. Aims: The study was aimed at identifying the factors associated with letrozole resistance among women with World Health Organization (WHO) group II anovulation. Subjects and Methods: Study was conducted at the infertility clinic at a tertiary care hospital in Sri Lanka. A case-control study design was used and included 50 subjects with WHO group II anovulation (25 clomifene responsive and 25 clomifene resistant). After a treatment cycle of letrozole, the factors were compared between the subjects who responded and those who failed to respond to treatment. Results: Ovulation was achieved in 76% (n = 19) of subjects who had responded to clomifene previously and in 24% (n = 6) with clomifene resistance. The factors associated with letrozole resistance included the presence of hirsutism (odds ratio [OR]: 3.89; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2-12.3) and clomifene resistance (OR: 10.03; 95% CI: 2.81-35.7). The early follicular phase mean (standard deviation) luteinizing hormone level was significantly higher among the nonresponders (9.75 [4.78] - 7.28 [2.3]; P = 0.02). Nonresponders showed significantly lower levels of oestradiol on the 5 th and 9 th days (28.50 [3.39] pg/mL vs. 7.49 [3.62] pg/mL; P = 0.0007 and 142.04 [76.22] pg/mL vs. 28.10 [12.8] pg/mL; P = 0.0001) of the menstrual cycle, respectively. Conclusions: The features associated with resistance to Letrozole at a dose of 2.5 mg show some overlap with those associated with clomifene resistance. However, some features do not show similar association. The effectiveness of letrozole at a dose of 2.5 mg in induction of ovulation among women with clomifene resistance is low and it does not seem to be a suitable treatment at a dose of 2.5 mg for this indication. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Anovulation 
690 |a clomifene resistance 
690 |a letrozole 
690 |a letrozole resistance 
690 |a Gynecology and obstetrics 
690 |a RG1-991 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences, Vol 8, Iss 2, Pp 75-79 (2015) 
787 0 |n http://www.jhrsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0974-1208;year=2015;volume=8;issue=2;spage=75;epage=79;aulast=Palihawadana 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/0974-1208 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1998-4766 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/f6eb4cde008d4afdb9c47d49b697ecf4  |z Connect to this object online.