General Practitioners Using Complementary and Alternative Medicine Differ From General Practitioners Using Conventional Medicine in Their View of the Risks of Electromagnetic Fields
Objective: General practitioners (GPs) play a key role in consulting patients worried about health effects of electromagnetic fields (EMF). We compared GPs using conventional medicine (COM) with GPs using complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) concerning their perception of EMF risks. Moreover...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Bernd Kowall (Author), Jürgen Breckenkamp (Author), Gabriele Berg-Beckhoff (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing,
2015-01-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Characteristics and job satisfaction of general practitioners using complementary and alternative medicine in Germany - is there a pattern?
by: Joos Stefanie, et al.
Published: (2011) -
How Complementary and Alternative Medicine Practitioners Use PubMed
by: Willinsky, John, et al.
Published: (2007) -
How German general practitioners justify their provision of complementary and alternative medicine - a qualitative study
by: Agnes Ostermaier, et al.
Published: (2020) -
Feasibility of a cohort study on health risks caused by occupational exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields
by: Wahrendorf Jürgen, et al.
Published: (2009) -
Consultations in primary care for symptoms attributed to electromagnetic fields - a survey among general practitioners
by: Röösli Martin, et al.
Published: (2006)