Decoding of Multiple Wrist and Hand Movements Using a Transient EMG Classifier
The design of prosthetic controllers by means of neurophysiological signals still poses a crucial challenge to bioengineers. State of the art of electromyographic (EMG) continuous pattern recognition controllers rely on the questionable assumption that repeated muscular contractions produce repeatab...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Book |
| Published: |
IEEE,
2023-01-01T00:00:00Z.
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | The design of prosthetic controllers by means of neurophysiological signals still poses a crucial challenge to bioengineers. State of the art of electromyographic (EMG) continuous pattern recognition controllers rely on the questionable assumption that repeated muscular contractions produce repeatable patterns of steady-state EMG signals. Conversely, we propose an algorithm that decodes wrist and hand movements by processing the signals that immediately follow the onset of contraction (i.e., the <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\textit {transient}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> EMG). We collected EMG data from the forearms of 14 non-amputee and 5 transradial amputee participants while they performed wrist flexion/extension, pronation/supination, and four hand grasps (power, lateral, bi-digital, open). We firstly identified the combination of wrist and hand movements that yielded the best control performance for the same participant (intra-subject classification). Then, we assessed the ability of our algorithm to classify participant data that were not included in the training set (cross-subject classification). Our controller achieved a median accuracy of ~96% with non-amputees, while it achieved heterogeneous outcomes with amputees, with a median accuracy of ~89%. Importantly, for each amputee, it produced at least one <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\textit {acceptable}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> combination of wrist-hand movements (i.e., with accuracy >85%). Regarding the cross-subject classifier, while our algorithm obtained promising results with non-amputees (accuracy up to ~80%), they were not as good with amputees (accuracy up to ~35%), possibly suggesting further assessments with domain-adaptation strategies. In general, our offline outcomes, together with a preliminary online assessment, support the hypothesis that the transient EMG decoding could represent a viable pattern recognition strategy, encouraging further online assessments. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | 1558-0210 10.1109/TNSRE.2022.3218430 |