Different fabrication techniques of implant-supported prostheses

Aim: This study evaluated the mechanical behavior of implant-supported crowns obtained by different fabrication technique after thermomechanical cycling. Methods: Thirty-two external hexagon dental implants were divided into four groups (n=10): CC - conventional casting with torch; EI - electromagne...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Silas Monteiro Borges (Author), Stephanie Francoi Poole (Author), Izabela Cristina Maurício Moris (Author), Aloísio Oro Spazzin (Author), Adriana Cláudia Lapria Faria (Author), Erica Alves Gomes (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 2019-11-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Aim: This study evaluated the mechanical behavior of implant-supported crowns obtained by different fabrication technique after thermomechanical cycling. Methods: Thirty-two external hexagon dental implants were divided into four groups (n=10): CC - conventional casting with torch; EI - electromagnetic induction casting; PL - plasma casting; and CAD-CAM - milling through computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing. Vickers microhardness of the specimens were made before and after the thermomechanical cycling, and then subjected to fracture load. Fracture pattern was evaluated. Results: No significant difference was observed comparing the microhardness before and after thermomechanical cycling. CAD-CAM group presented significant lower microhardness than the other groups. No significant statistical difference was showed on fracture load between the groups. The CAD-CAM and PL presented lower number of failure by plastic deformation. Conclusion: The manufacturing techniques affected the mechanical behavior and the failure pattern of implant-supported crowns tested.
Item Description:10.20396/bjos.v18i0.8657254
1677-3225