Control of anterior segment using an antero-posterior lingual sliding retraction system: a preliminary cone-beam CT study

Abstract Background This study was performed to evaluate the treatment effects of the antero-posterior lingual retractor (APLR), focusing on the 3-dimensional (3D) tooth movement of the maxillary anterior teeth and their alveolar bone levels. Methods En masse retraction was performed using either th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Min Hwang (Author), Hyo-Won Ahn (Author), Soon-Yong Kwon (Author), Jeong-Ho Choi (Author), Seong-Hun Kim (Author), Gerald Nelson (Author)
Format: Book
Published: SpringerOpen, 2018-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_f8d75a7bcbc34d44b7344e6e0b4d2bbe
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Min Hwang  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Hyo-Won Ahn  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Soon-Yong Kwon  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Jeong-Ho Choi  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Seong-Hun Kim  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Gerald Nelson  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Control of anterior segment using an antero-posterior lingual sliding retraction system: a preliminary cone-beam CT study 
260 |b SpringerOpen,   |c 2018-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1186/s40510-017-0202-0 
500 |a 2196-1042 
520 |a Abstract Background This study was performed to evaluate the treatment effects of the antero-posterior lingual retractor (APLR), focusing on the 3-dimensional (3D) tooth movement of the maxillary anterior teeth and their alveolar bone levels. Methods En masse retraction was performed using either the C-lingual retractor (CLR, C-group, n = 9) or the antero-posterior lingual retractor (APLR, AP-group, n = 8). We evaluated 3D movement of the maxillary anterior teeth and alveolar bone levels, root length of the central incisors, long axes of the maxillary canines, and occlusal plane changes from CBCT images. Results After retraction, the central incisors were more significantly intruded and their root apex was more retracted in the AP-group. The long axis of the canine was well maintained in the AP-group. There were no differences in the steepness of occlusal plane and the incidence of alveolar bone loss or of root resorption during en masse retraction with the two retractors. Conclusions The clockwise bowing effect of the anterior segment was less with the APLR, which prevented unwanted canine movement. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Lingual orthodontics 
690 |a Torque 
690 |a Intrusion 
690 |a CBCT 
690 |a Alveolus 
690 |a TSADs 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Progress in Orthodontics, Vol 19, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2018) 
787 0 |n http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40510-017-0202-0 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2196-1042 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/f8d75a7bcbc34d44b7344e6e0b4d2bbe  |z Connect to this object online.