Limiting worker exposure to highly pathogenic avian influenza a (H5N1): a repeat survey at a rendering plant processing infected poultry carcasses in the UK

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Current occupational and public health guidance does not distinguish between rendering plant workers and cullers/poultry workers in terms of infection risk in their respective roles during highly pathogenic avian influenza poultry ou...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Afza Musarrat (Author), Edeghere Obaghe (Author), Coetzee Nicol (Author), Duggal Harsh V (Author)
Format: Book
Published: BMC, 2011-08-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_f8de1bdbe02e4737b15ea6c40ebfffc8
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Afza Musarrat  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Edeghere Obaghe  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Coetzee Nicol  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Duggal Harsh V  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Limiting worker exposure to highly pathogenic avian influenza a (H5N1): a repeat survey at a rendering plant processing infected poultry carcasses in the UK 
260 |b BMC,   |c 2011-08-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1186/1471-2458-11-626 
500 |a 1471-2458 
520 |a <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Current occupational and public health guidance does not distinguish between rendering plant workers and cullers/poultry workers in terms of infection risk in their respective roles during highly pathogenic avian influenza poultry outbreaks. We describe an operational approach to human health risk assessment decision making at a large rendering plant processing poultry carcasses stemming from two separate highly pathogenic avian influenza A (H5N1) outbreaks in England during 2007.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>During the first incident a uniform approach assigned equal exposure risk to all rendering workers in or near the production line. A task based exposure assessment approach was adopted during the second incident based on a hierarchy of occupational activities and potential for infection exposure. Workers assessed as being at risk of infection were offered personal protective equipment; pre-exposure antiviral prophylaxis; seasonal influenza immunisation; hygiene advice; and health monitoring. A repeat survey design was employed to compare the two risk assessment approaches, with allocation of antiviral prophylaxis as the main outcome variable.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Task based exposure assessment during the second incident reduced the number of workers assessed at risk of infection from 72 to 55 (24% reduction) when compared to the first incident. No cases of influenza like illness were reported in workers during both incidents.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Task based exposure assessment informs a proportionate public health response in rendering plant workers during highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 outbreaks, and reduces reliance on extensive antiviral prophylaxis.</p> 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n BMC Public Health, Vol 11, Iss 1, p 626 (2011) 
787 0 |n http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/11/626 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1471-2458 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/f8de1bdbe02e4737b15ea6c40ebfffc8  |z Connect to this object online.