Health systems resilience in practice: a scoping review to identify strategies for building resilience

Abstract Background Research on health systems resilience has focused primarily on the theoretical development of the concept and its dimensions. There is an identified knowledge gap in the research on how to build resilience in health systems in practice and 'what works' in different cont...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lena Forsgren (Author), Fabrizio Tediosi (Author), Karl Blanchet (Author), Dell D Saulnier (Author)
Format: Book
Published: BMC, 2022-09-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_f8de88de3e3f4384a685c8d95bfd0124
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Lena Forsgren  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Fabrizio Tediosi  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Karl Blanchet  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Dell D Saulnier  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Health systems resilience in practice: a scoping review to identify strategies for building resilience 
260 |b BMC,   |c 2022-09-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1186/s12913-022-08544-8 
500 |a 1472-6963 
520 |a Abstract Background Research on health systems resilience has focused primarily on the theoretical development of the concept and its dimensions. There is an identified knowledge gap in the research on how to build resilience in health systems in practice and 'what works' in different contexts. The aim of this study is to identify practical strategies for building resilient health systems from the empirical research on health systems resilience. Methods A scoping review included empirical research on health systems resilience from peer-reviewed literature. The search in the electronic databases PubMed, Web of Science, Global Health was conducted during January to March 2021 for articles published in English between 2013 to February 2021. A total of 1771 articles were screened, and data was extracted from 22 articles. The articles included empirical, applied research on strategies for resilience, that observed or measured resilience during shocks or chronic stress through collection of primary data or analysis of secondary data, or if they were a review study of empirical research. A narrative summary was done by identifying action-oriented strategies, comparing them, and presenting them by main thematic areas. Results The results demonstrate examples of strategies used or recommended within nine identified thematic areas; use of community resources, governance and financing, leadership, surveillance, human resources, communication and collaboration, preparedness, organizational capacity and learning and finally health system strengthening. Conclusions The findings emphasize the importance of improved governance and financing, empowered middle-level leadership, improved surveillance systems and strengthened human resources. A re-emphasized focus on health systems strengthening with better mainstreaming of health security and international health regulations are demonstrated in the results as a crucial strategy for building resilience. A lack of strategies for recovery and lessons learnt from crises are identified as gaps for resilience in future. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Health systems 
690 |a Resilience 
690 |a Scoping review 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n BMC Health Services Research, Vol 22, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2022) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08544-8 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1472-6963 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/f8de88de3e3f4384a685c8d95bfd0124  |z Connect to this object online.